↓ Download PDF ← Back to Library
ANTIOCH UNIVERSITY
ANNUAL INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH REPORT
To The
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
October 2007
r r f f r r r r r r r r r f r r r r r r r r r r r f f r f r f· r r r r fer r f f f f t
ANTIOCH UNIVERSITY
INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH
REPORT FOR THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OCTOBER 2007
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Page 6
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Page 7
ENROLLMENT REPORT GRAPHS AND CHARTS
Graph 1: Total Unduplicated Headcount by Campus Page 10
Graph 2: New Headcount by Campus Page 11
Graph 3: Student FTE by Campus (Full Time Equivalent) Page 12
Chart 1: 2006-07 Racial and Ethnic Distribution by Campus Page 13
Selected Headcount Admissions Metrics
Graph 4: Antioch College Page 14
Graph 5: Ph.D in Leadership and Change Page 15
Graph 6: Antioch McGregor Page 16
Graph 7: Antioch New England Page 17
Graph 8: Antioch Seattle Page 18
Graph 9: Antioch Los Angeles Page 19
Graph 10:Antioch Santa Barbara Page 20
Table 1: Enrollment Report Data Page 21
REVENUE REPORT GRAPHS
Graph 11: Net Tuition as % of Total Revenue by Campus Page 22
Graph 12: Total Revenues by Campus Page 23
Table 2: Revenue Report Data Page 24
Page 2
DEVELOPMENT REPORTS
Graph 13: Total Gift Revenue by Campus Page 25
Graph 14: Antioch College Gifts and Endowments Page 26
Graph 15: Endowment Balances (Non-Residential Campuses) Page 27
Graph 16: Grants and Contracts (Non-Residential Campuses) Page 28
Table 3: Development Report Data Page 29
FINANCIAL AID GRAPHS
Graph 17: Percent of Students Receiving Financial Aid by Campus Page 30
Graph 18: Total Financial Aid Awarded by Campus Page 31
Graph 19: Students Receiving Financial Aid by Campus Page 32
Graph 20: Financial Aid Per Student by Campus Page 33
Table 4: Financial Aid Report Data Page 34
EMPLOYMENT GRAPHS
Graph 21: Total Faculty FTE Page 35
Graph 22: Student/Total Faculty Ratios Page 36
Graph 23: Assoc. – Adjunct/Core Faculty Ratios Page 37
Graph 24: Percentage of Employee Compensation to Total Expenses Page 38
Table 5: Employment Data Sheet Page 39
APPENDICES
Antioch College (Blue Pages)
1.1 Enrollment Metrics
1.2 Revenue and Expense Metrics
1.3 Development Metrics
1.4 Financial Aid Metrics
1.5 Employment Metrics
Page 3
APPENDICES (Continued)
Ph.D in Leadership and Change (Pink Pages)
2.1 Enrollment Metrics
2.2 Revenue and Expense Metrics
2.3 Financial Aid Metrics
2.4 Employment Metrics
McGregor (White Pages)
3.1 Enrollment Metrics
3.2 Revenue and Expense Metrics
3.3 Development Metrics
3.4 Financial Aid Metrics
3.5 Employment Metrics
New England Graduate School (Yellow Pages)
4.1 Enrollment Metrics
4.2 Revenue and Expense Metrics
4.3 Development Metrics
4.4 Financial Aid Metrics
4.5 Employment Metrics
Seattle (Green Pages)
5.1 Enrollment Metrics
5.2 Revenue and Expense Metrics
5.3 Development Metrics
5.4 Financial Aid Metrics
5.5 Employment Metrics
Page 4
r r f r r f r f r f’ [, r r’ r f f f r f f’ r f r r r r f’ [, f’ f r r r r r r f r r [, (‘, r r r
APPENDICES (Continued)
Southern California (Orange Pages)
6.1 Los Angeles Enrollment Metrics
6.2 Santa Barbara Enrollment Metrics
6.3 Southern California Revenue and Expense Metrics
6.4 Southern California Development Metrics
6.5 Los Angeles Financial Aid Metrics
6.6 Santa Barbara Financial Aid Metrics
6.7 Los Angeles Employment Metrics
6.8 Santa Barbara Employment Metrics
Page 5
r r [‘ f’ r r r r r r r r [‘, r r r f’ r r f f’r r r- r f r r r r r f’r r r r r f’ f r r f r r
INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The following research report provides the results of a multi-year, University-wide institutional data collection and
analysis of the Antioch campuses. The research covers enrollments, revenues and expenses, development, financial aid, and
employment from the Academic Years 2002-2003 through projected 2007-2008 (dependent on the most accurate data available
for each campus). For the sake of convenience, the Ph.D in Leadership and Change Program is identified as a “campus.”
This report could not have been compiled without the commitment of the people who are listed below. They are
entitled to our appreciation for the time and hard work that they contributed to this effort. It should be noted that many of
the people noted below in Antioch Central Administration, Antioch College, Ph.D Program, and McGregor worked together
to support each other’s efforts to generate the data for this report.
ANTIOCH CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION: Virginia Dowse, Deborah Caraway, Suzette Castonguay, Debra Fritz, Candice
Santell, Karen Snyder
ANTIOCH COLLEGE: Doug Wamer, Angela Glukhov
ANTIOCH PH.D IN LEADERSHIP AND CHANGE: Vickie Nighswander
ANTIOCH MCGREGOR: Brigette Dinnen, Darlene Robertson, Gerald Hunter, Deena Kent-Hummel, Kathy John
ANTIOCH NEW ENGLAND: Elizabeth Fitzgerald, Susan Howard, Kathy Curtiss, Rowland Russell
ANTIOCH SEATTLE: Greg Schuler (overall coordinator), Candiss Eickelmann, Katy Gilroy, Wendy Dahl, Sharon Sernius,
Barbara Talmadge, Tan Truong, Dan Watts, Robert Cantillo
ANTIOCH LOS ANGELES: Dale Johnston, Barbara Berg, Ed Ogawa, Robert Stapp, Emee Dacanay, Chris Wolfe, Naomi
Castro, Michael Nee
ANTIOCH SANTA BARBARA: Richard Whitney, Nanci Braunschweiger, Lorna Hunt, Mary Ann Marwitz, Mike Meraz,
Cecilia Schneider
(Special acknowledgement to Rowland Russell, who for a number of years has set up the systems and coordinated and
prepared the data for the Financial Aid reports for all of the campuses).
Page 6
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrfrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrf’fr
EXECUTIVES~Y
There has been a continued decrease in total student unduplicated headcount (HC) (see Graph 1) and FuD-Time
Equivalents (FTE, see Graph 3) primarily because ofthe situation at Antioch CoDege. However, new students (Graph 2) at
the CoDege in 2006-07 exceeded a low number experienced in 2005-06, but not enough to approach historical totals, and they
were not enough to offset graduations and attrition, thus accounting for the lower unduplicated headcount numbers. The Los
Angeles campus has been posting positive enroUment growth over the past few years. The other campuses have been showing
either flat or slightly negative enroDment growth. The Ph.D program headcount is increasing with the addition of cohorts
each year and minimal graduations to date.
In 2006-07, racial and ethnic percentages by campus (Cbart 1) range from 3.4% at New England to 30.6% at
McGregor. Significant percentages of minority students were recorded at Los Angeles (29%), Santa Barbara (27%) and in
tbe University Ph.D program (25%). However, the high percentage in the “other” category, particularly for the College and
Seattle, skews the results and no doubt causes the figures for students of color at those campuses to be underreported as well
as for others. There are significant percentages of Mrican American students at McGregor and Los Angeles (27.4% and
13.9% respectively). Both of these figures have increased over the previous year. Santa Barbara reports that 19.5% of its
students are Hispanic, which is also an increase from the previous year. As for the gender distribution, the proportion of
female students at the adult campuses ranges from 60-80%. More data on student demographic composition for each campus
is provided in the Enrollment Metrics pages in the Appendix.
The campus admissions metrics and graphs (4 through 10) provide information on applications, acceptances, and
matriculants for each campus. The data on the graphs include acceptance rates (the percentages of applicants who were
accepted by the institution) and yield rates (the percentages ofthose accepted who actuaDy registered or matriculated). When
interpreting the admissions metrics, one should bear in mind that the acceptance rate is usuaDy an indicator of the quality of
student admitted (i.e., whether the institution is considered to have selective or open admissions). The yield rate indicates the
institution’s ability to capture those students who have applied and been accepted. In 2007, acceptance rates ranged from
57% at the CoDege to 81% at Los Angeles. Yield rates ranged from 17.4% at the College to 96% at McGregor. The average
yield rate for the non-residential campuses in 2007 was 89%.
For 2006-07, the projected net tuition and fee revenue as a percentage of total revenues (Graph 11) was 33.9% for tbe
College. At the non-residential campuses, the range of percentages is very close, averaging 85.3%.
Although total revenues from 2002-03 to 2006-07 have increased by 21.6%, from $59.7 million to the projected $72.6
million, the overaD increase in 2006-07 amounted to $595,467 or less than 1% (Graph 12). There was a significant decrease in
Page?
r r r r r f’ r r r r r r r r r r f’ r f r f’ f r r r r r r [ r r r r [‘ r r r f f r r r f r
revenue at the Seattle campus amounting to over $1 million or nearly 7% and a nearly $700,000 decrease at Antioch College as
well.
Gift and contract income is another revenue factor. Gift revenue increased by $176,955 or 4.5% primarily because of
the continuing campaign at McGregor, where an increase of $299,040 was achieved (see Graph 13).
The College’s endowment fund is $19 million (Graph 14). This is a decrease ofSl0,OOO,000since 2004-05 most of which
was used for the renewal campaign. Endowment funds for the non-residential campuses, in cases where they exist, are small
(Graph 15). For those non-residential campuses that have endowments (McGregor, New England, and Seattle), the growth
over the reporting period has been from a total of $253,599 in 2003 to $574,722 in 2007. (please note that the amount shown in
the Graph does not include total accumulated interest, but only principal).
Grant and contract revenue increased for all campuses contributing to diversity of revenue (Graph 16). The annual
total grant and contract revenue has increased from $4.2 million in 2003 to $7.0 million in 2006 or by 67% but decreased to
$6.2 million in 2007 (see Table 3).
The increasing percentage of our Antioch students at all of the campuses who rely on fmancial aid is probably not
surprising (Graph 17). For the purposes of this report, financial aid includes Federal and state grant programs, loans,
scholarships and tuition discounts. The average percentage has increased from about 62% to 71% during the reporting
period. It should be noted that the increase at the non-residential campuses probably reflects an increase in loans because
graduate students are not eligible for Federal grant programs. Trends in total student financial aid amounts awarded and
the numbers of students receiving aid (Graphs 18 and 19) are reflective of enrollment trends for the various campuses during
the reporting period. Although the overall number of students receiving aid has tended to be relatively flat, the total student
financial aid awarded by all campuses has increased from $49 million in FY 2003 to $61.7 million in FY 2007 and the average
financial aid per student has increased from $14,312 in 2003 to $18,239 in 2007, an increase of 27.4% (Graph 20).
Core faculty employment, as measured by full time equivalents (FTE) has decreased about 5% over the past year with
all campuses posting decreases except for Los Angeles. Total faculty including adjuncts and associates decreased by 7.6%
(Graph 21). Student/faculty ratios on the non-residential campuses range from 16.3 at New England to 23.7 at Seattle and
Los Angeles (Graph 22). Utilization in terms of FTE of associate and adjunct faculty in relation to core faculty varied
throughout the system (Graph 23). Three campuses (McGregor, Los Angeles, and Santa Barbara) had relatively high ratios
of 0.84 – 0.95; the ratio at the College fell from 0.42 to 0.17. Salaries and benefits made up between 55% to 70% oftotal
campus expenses (Graph 23).
The ratio of students to administrators/staff varied over the system. It was 3.0 at the College, reflecting that it is a
residential campus. The non-residential campuses ranged from 18.1 at Seattle to 28.4 at Los Angeles. The gender
distribution of core faculty also varied with a tendency for there to be more female faculty than male. Administrative/staff
PageS
r r r” [, r r” r r” r r r r r f f” f r r f’ f’ f’ f” f” r f r r r r r f’ f r r r” r r (‘ r f’ f..- r r
employees tended to be female. In terms of ethnicity for both faculty and staff, the non-minority (Caucasian) percentage
varied by location. For core faculty, the range was from 63.2% in Seattle to 94.4% in New England; for staff, from 65.6% in
Los Angeles to 96.2% in New England. Seattle and Santa Barbara recorded 13% of their faculty as AsianlPacific Islander.
Los Angeles reported that 19% of their faculty were African American. The percentage of African American staff at the
Ohio campuses was 16.4% for the College and 18.8% at McGregor. The significant minority distribution of staff at the Los
Angeles campus was 13.3% African American and 10% each for Asian and Hispanic. Additional faculty and staff
demographic information can be found in the individual employment metrics reports in the Appendices.
The Appendices provide more specific information by campus in the categories of enrollment, revenue/expense,
development, financial aid, and employment. As can be seen from most of the graphs, the consistent reporting of the data over
the past years is now at a point that 5-year trends can be readily identified in these areas.
Page 9
Enrollment Reports
Graph 1: Antioch University
Total Unduplicated Headcount by Campus (2003-2007)
1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
o
…
• • • ….
–
..
—– ~
–
~ – —
-+- Antioch College
~
_ University PhD
—.- McGregor
– New England
—.- Seattle
~
-+- Los Angeles
-+- Santa Barbara
………….
……..
• •• •
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
(see Table 1 for the specific headcount numbers)
Page 10
Enrollment Reports
Graph 2: Antioch University
New Headcount by Campus (2003-2007)
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
o
– ~
~ ~… ~- —-…..
~-..
~ …..
~ ~
• • • •,
-+– Antioch College
_ University PhD
—-.- McGregor
– New England
—-.- Seattle
………Los Angeles
-+– Santa Barbara
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
(see Table 1 for specific headcount numbers)
Page 11
Enrollment Reports
Graph 3: Antioch University
Student FTE by Campus (2003-2007)
(Full Time Equivalent)
1,000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
o
———-~ ——–
~
——- —
~
~
——–~ – ~Antioch College
~ ~ _ University Ph.D
~ ~ -.- McGregor
or
… – New England
• • • -‘-Seattle
………Los Angeles
~Santa Barbara
–
—
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
(see Table 1 for specific FTE numbers)
Page 12
Enrollment Reports
Chart 1: Antioch University System
2006-07 Racial and Ethnic Distribution by Campus
(Total Student Headcount Population)
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0% +——–==——,,—,,-~——-=-
60.0% ~–~~…..,
50.0% +——
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
-Caucasian
_ Racial & Ethnic Minorities
oOther
(“Other” includes those
who have selected “non
resident alien; other or
unknown; or “prefer not
to report” on their
applications)
Antioch
College
University McGregor New England Seattle Los Angeles Santa
Ph.D Barbara
(see Enrollment Metrics reports in Appendices for more detailed information)
Page 13
Enrollment Reports
Graph 4: Antioch College
Selected Headcount Admissions Metrics (2003-2007)
1600 –r————————————-,
1400 +—————————————-j
1200
1359
1000 +——————————f———–1
800 -+——————————/————–1
774
57%
592
600 +——===–===:::=::::===~~——–I_–~:/__—–~
400 389
70.4%
(Acceptance rate) 65.7%
200 135124
47.8 0
51.2%
45.8% (yield rate)
36.2% 29.7% 17.4%
0
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
-+- Applications
_ Accepted Students
……….Matriculants
Page 14
Enrollment Reports
Graph 5: Ph.D in Leadership and Change
Selected Headcount Admissions Metrics (2003-2007)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
o
60
vO
~”‘
~
65%
“‘.., 64%…. .. 39
65% (acceptance rate) 71%
~
34_
.~? 72%
82% (yield rate) 76%
£ ‘)7 28
— 26 23 62%
84% ……
~Applications
_ Accepted Students
~Matriculants
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
Page 15
Enrollment Report
Graph 6: Antioch McGregor
Selected Headcount Admissions Metrics (2003-2007)
600 -.—————————————–,
-+- Applications
– Accepted Students
……….Matriculants
426
78%
96%
546
85%
95%
27485%
96%85%
96%
296
309
363
500 +———————————~———–j
81 % (acceptance rate)
200 +–_—–‘=l.U-.t.C0 ‘-+.}U0C1U–‘-CW”-J- ______j
400 +——————–,—————–7”——r—r—–il~–______j
100 +—————————————-1
0+————-r————,———-…,….————1
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
Page 16
Enrollment Report
Graph 7: Antioch New England
Selected Headcount Admissions Metrics (2003-2007)
600
500
400
300
200
100
o
535
~
511
…
~
329 349
~334–315
~-~ ,~vlL. vL.v
62.7% (acceptance rate) 61.6% 61.5% 627~2597% (yield rate) 99.0% 98.2% 94.6%
204
67.4%
90.7%
~Applications
– Accepted Students
-.- Matriculants
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
Page 17
Enrollment Report
Graph 8: Antioch Seattle
Selected Headcount Admissions Metrics (2003-2007)
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
o
……
— –~ 821
——–
-“”””
717
523
71% (accepta~e 500rate) ~~
‘””7″”7
~
‘vv
387 _______________ 64%
68% 61% –::::r
91% 95% -372 36780%
77% 55%
(yield rate) 96%
-+- Applications
_ Accepted Students
-.- Matriculants
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
Page 18
Enrollment Report
Graph 9: Antioch Los Angeles
Selected Headcount Admissions Metrics (2003-2007)
800 ,…—————————————–,
691
700 +————————————.~—–j
600 +- ——, ..>LL””—–__=_-“””=———–~~—–j
~Applications
_ Accepted Students
……- Matriculants
87%
489 81%
74.8%
91.2%
39376.9%
91.2%
412
452
588
500 +————————=-……,::::=—————:,——-j
400 -I—~::::::::::::==——==~—-……….””,=::::::=====~~______;;_;~——~80.0%
85.0%
300 +-==-::-:-:—-,——.,.———————————–j77.8% (acceptance rate)
91.6% (yield rate)
200 +——————————————–j
100
o
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
Page 19
Enrollment Report
Graph 10: Antioch Santa Barbara
Selected Headcount Admissions Metrics (2003-2007)
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
o
‘)Q’)
/324
2/243 “,..
—-~
…
65%
209 21279%
•
84% (acceptance rate)
•194 “A A RA%
L.
177
~.
……193
79% .. 91%
74% (yield rate) 168 85%
-+- Applications
_ Accepted Students
-+- Matriculants
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
Page 20
I
‘-
“-
‘JiIIfJ
10/9/2007
‘JiIIfJ
TABLE 1
dlIlilf
Enrollment Data,
~
‘VI!!IiiI Total Unduplicated Headcount (Graph 1)
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07……
“- Antioch College 836 763 597 377
“-
University Ph.D 64 85 96 114
McGregor 909 896 865 856
.- New England 1,127 1,141 1,133 1,104
“-‘
Seattle 1,291 1,317 1,244 1,207
Los Angeles 915 925 938 1,004
i.- Santa Barbara 429 419 434 431
~ TOTAL 5,571 5,546 5,307 5,093
l.- New Headcount (Graph 2)
~ 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
l.- Antioch College 186 124 63 135
~ University Ph.D 26 27 23 28
I”e,t McGregor 336 296 312 315
New England 346 362 359 369
“- Seattle 475 473 374 364
;
Los Angeles 378 356 376 441i.-
Santa Barbara 200 173 171 163
I.w TOTAL 1,947 1,811 1,678 1,815
“-
~ FTE (Graph 3)
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
i.- Antioch College 713 711 592 433
University Ph.D 64 85 96 114lIIIiV
McGregor 721 735 750 713,
i.- New England 759 763 723 754
‘VI!!IiiI Seattle 786 874 796 726
Los Angeles 419 439 567 574
i.- Santa Barbara 351 356 332 372
~ TOTAL 3,813 3,963 3,857 3,685
e-
‘- Ethnic Distribution 2006-07 (Chart 1)
e- Racial & Ethnic
(.., Caucasian Minorities Other
“-‘ Antioch College 47.0% 6.0% 47.0%
i.- University Ph.D 69.3% 25.3% 5.4%
‘-‘ McGregor 65.7% 30.6% 3.7%
–
New England 86.2% 3.4% 10.3%
Seattle 67.3% 15.3% 17.4%
.,., Los Angeles 64.4% 29.1% 6.5%
~
“-‘ Page 21
~
“-‘
“-
“-
‘-
“-
Santa Barbara 65.2% 27.0% 7.8%
“””
–
ADMISSIONS INFORMATION (Graphs 4-10)
– ANTIOCH COLLEGE
‘- 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
“- Applications 592 622 414 1359
Accepted Students 389 343 212 774
I- Matriculants 186 124 63 135
l.-
I.-
Ph.D Program
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
I.- Applications 48 57 58 60
‘-
Accepted Students 34 32 37 39
Matriculants 26 27 23 28
I.-
G- McGregor
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
‘- Applications 363 375 322 546
‘-
Accepted Students 309 318 288 426
Matriculants 296 304 274 409
l-
I.- New England
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
.- Applications 511 535 557 334, Accepted Students 315 329 349 225”-, Matriculants 312 323 330 204
I.-
“- Seattle
‘-
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
Applications 773 821 706 717
“- Accepted Students 523 500 387 460
“-
Matriculants 477 473 372 367
‘- Los Angeles
‘-
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
Applications 588 576 617 691
‘- Accepted Students 452 431 496 562
I.- Matriculants 412 393 423 489
‘-
~ Santa Barbara
~
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
Applications 292 264 248 324
.- Accepted Students 243 211 209 212
I.- Matriculants 194 168 177 193
G-
‘-
“””…,
l.-
I.- Page 21
‘-
‘-
Revenue Report
Graph 11: Antioch University
Net Tuition as % of Total Revenue by Campus
2003-2007
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
–
-a
….. ——….
~
— ===— ——
-+- Antioch College
—..- McGregor
..
————
_ New England
—..- Seattle
-+- Southern California
—-~ -University PhD……
2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
(see Table 2 for the specific percentages by campus)
Page 22
Revenue Report
Graph 12: Antioch University
Total Revenues by Campus (2003-2007)
$20,000,000
$18,000,000
$16,000,000
$14,000,000
$12,000,000
$10,000,000
$8,000,000
$6,000,000
$4,000,000
$2,000,000
$0
“”””””
—— –…..
—
….
–
——=====
…… -II
~
— – —-a
:——-
~Antioch College
—…..-McGregor
_ New England
—…..-Seattle
.-A. – Southern California
—
_ University Ph.D-..
-..
2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005
(See Table 2 for specific revenue numbers by campus)
2005-06 2006-07
Page 23
10/9/2007
TABLE 2
Revenue-Expense Data Sheet
2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
$17,515,890 $17,417,292 $18,964,237 $18,457,319 $17,757,979
$6,315,364 $6,751,687 $7,152,228 $7,405,326 $8,205,111
$11,923,734 $12,745,435 $13,822,766 $13,924,797 $14,529,790
$10,753,675 $12,444,846 $13,961,719 $14,635,418 $13,625,445
$12,515,035 $13,771,892 $14,889,950 $16,065,931 $16,661,579
$687,523 $1,063,414 $1,340,470 $1,545,065 $1,849,419
$59,711,221 $64,194,566 $70,131,370 $72,033,856 $72,629,323
Net Tuition and Fees as a Percent of Revenue (Table 11)
CAMPUS 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005
Antioch College 50.6% 46.8% 40.5%
McGregor 97.2% 97.8% 98.5%
New England 80.7% 77.6% 81.1%
Seattle 86.4% 82.2% 85.1%
Southern California 90.4% 89.9% 89.5%
University Ph.D 89.8% 94.0% 98.9%
Total Revenue (Table 12)
CAMPUS
Antioch College
McGregor
New England
Seattle
Southern California
University Ph.D
TOTAL
2005-06
35.7%
92.4%
79.9%
79.3%
89.9%
99.8%
2006-07
33.9%
87.2%
81.1%
80.0%
92.9%
98.8%
Page 24
Development Reports
Graph 13: Antioch University
Total Gift Revenue by Campus (2003-2007)
(Non-Residential Campuses)
$1,800,000
$1,600,000
$1,400,000
$1,200,000
$1,000,000
$800,000
$600,000
$400,000
$200,000
$0
/
// —-…-McGregor
/
_ New England
—-…-Seattle
/
average _ SouthernCalifornia
/
/ L ….
—— –L ~ – —
~-
.-r -r –
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06
(See Table 4 for specific amounts)
2006-07
Page 25
Development Reports
Graph 14: Antioch University
Antioch College Gifts and Endowment (2003-2007)
$35,000,000
$30,000,000
$25,000,000
$20,000,000
$15,000,000
$10,000,000
$5,000,000
$0
–
~
~-
-.- College Gifts
_ College Endowment
~
~ ~ –
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
(See Table 4 for specific amounts)
Page 26
Development Reports
Graph 15: Antioch University
Endowment Balances* by Campus (2003-2007)
(Non-Residential Campuses)
$400,000
$350,000
$300,000
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$0
.)I
/
/- …/
~ —.- McGregor
.–
~
_ New England
—.- Seattle
————~
• •
at.
..
(See Table 4 for specific amounts)
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
* – Note: does not include accumulated interest
Page 27
Development Reports
Graph 16: Antioch University
Grants and Contracts by Campus (2003-2007)
$2,500,000 .,————————————.,
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
-.- McGregor
_ New England
$1,000,000 +————————————-1 -‘-Seattle
-+- Southern California
-+- Antioch College
$0 +———,————–r———-r———–l
$500,000 -t——————=—-=————-=-t.._—–j
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
(See Table 4 for specific amounts)
Page 28
10/9/2007
TABLE 3
DEVELOPMENT DATA SHEET
Total Gift Revenue (Graph 13)
CAMPUS 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
College Gifts $3,242,472 $7,882,154 $1,984,133 $1,866,557
McGregor $49,704 $656,403 $1,272,717 $1,571,757
New England $375,982 $286,959 $359,306 $352,344
Seattle $93,274 $137,934 $93,824 $114,375
Southern California $70,480 $124,560 $88,261 $70,173
TOTAL $3,831,912 $9,088,010 $3,798,241 $3,975,206
AVERAGE (non-resid. campuses) $147,360 $301,464 $453,527 $527,162
Endowment Fund Balance (Graph 14)
CAMPUS 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
College Endowment $29,237,272 $29,527,319 $19,654,545 $19,936,005
McGregor $18,600 $21,600 $24,600 $27,600
New England $188,960 $238,960 $238,960 $359,054
Seattle $88,824 $128,290 $150,511 $188,068
Southern California $0 $0 $3 $4
TOTAL $29,533,656 $29,916,169 $20,068,619 $20,510,731
Grants and Contracts (Graph 15)
CAMPUS 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
Antioch College $1,479,626 $1,603,503 $2,153,103 $1,459,111
McGregor $89,383 $185,000 $185,000 $185,000
New England $2,218,646 $1,756,376 $1,952,919 $2,025,517
Seattle $1,486,352 $1,877,288 $2,017,735 $2,073,398
Southern California $134,371 $380,256 $676,800 $497,627
TOTAL $5,408,378 $5,802,423 $6,985,557 $6,240,653
Page 29
Financial Aid Report
Graph 17: Antioch University
Percent of Students Receiving Financial Aid by Campus
(2003-2007)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
/
… /
~
“”- ~ /- ./ ~
~”‘-” ~ – ~
~ – –:::a–
—————
_ University Ph.D
———-
-+- Antioch College
…- -+- McGregor
_ New England
-+-Seattle
-.-LA
-.- Santa Barbara
~AVERAGE
2003-2004 2004-2005
(see Table 3 for specific percentages)
2005-06 2006-07
Page 30
FINANCIAL AID REPORT
Graph 18: Antioch University
Total Financial Aid Awarded by Campus
(2003-2007)
$16,000,000 …,…———————————-,
$14,000,000 -!———-/-~——–~~F;;:=__————–j
$12,000,000 +—-~~””””::=–~~———————–I
$10,000,000 +————————=:~__.=============~~—I
$8,000,000 -!——-I-=::::::::::~————-=——————-j
$6,000,000 ~————————————–j
$4,000,000 ~—~=====:::::::===-……..~=============~=======~—~
_ University PhD
-+- Antioch College
-A- McGregor
– New England
-A-Seattle
~LA
~Santa Barbara
$2,000,000 -!—————————————j
• • • •
$0 +———,———,….———,————l
2003-2004 2004-2005
(See Table 3 for specific amounts)
2005-06 2006-07
Page 31
Financial Aid Report
Graph 19: Antioch University
Students Receiving Financial Aid by Campus
(2003-2007)
1,200 -,————————————–,
1,000 +—————————————1
800 +——————————–=…——–4
~—–~
_University PhD
–+- Antioch College
—….-McGregor
– New England
—….-Seattle
–+-LA
–+- Santa Barbara
400 I——————~=—-=::::::::::::::::===:_–I
• • • •
200 +——————————————1
o • • • •
2003-2004 2004-2005
(See Table 3 for specific numbers)
2005-06 2006-07
Page 32
Financial Aid Report
Graph 20: Antioch University
Financial Aid Per Student by Campus
(2003-2007)
$30,000 ,…————————————–,
$25,000 +—————————-=-‘~———–l
$20,000 1———:::::~=———-==-…..’1F==:=============:::::w~~———1
_.. —– ————-
$15,000
$10,000
$5,000 -t—————————————I
$0-t————-r———–.,.———-.,…..———–1
_University PhD
-+- Antioch College
–a– McGregor
– New England
–a– Seattle
~LA
~Santa Barbara
2003-2004 2004-2005
(See Table 3 for specific amounts)
2005-06 2006-07
Page 33
10/9/2007
TABLE 4
Financial Aid Data Sheet
PERCENTAGE RECEIVING FINANCIAL AID (Graph 16)
CAMPUS 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06 2006-07
University Ph.D 48.4% 56.5% 60.4% 50.9%
Antioch College 80.5% 68.0% 68.8% 97.3%
McGregor 64.0% 68.3% 66.4% 67.1%
New England 59.6% 62.5% 64.7% 67.2%
Seattle 66.7% 73.0% 70.0% 66.3%
LA 63.3% 64.6% 62.8% 61.0%
Santa Barbara 61.5% 67.8% 73.3% 69.6%
AVERAGE 65.9% 67.4% 67.7% 71.4%
(average does not include University Ph.D)
NO. STUDENTS RECEIVING FINANCIAL AID (Graph 18)
CAMPUS 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06
University Ph.D 31 48 58
Antioch College 666 519 411
McGregor 582 612 574
New England 680 714 733
Seattle 861 962 871
LA 579 598 589
Santa Barbara 264 284 318
TOTAL 3663 3737 3554
2006-07
58
367
574
742
801
612
300
3454
2006-07
$23,555
$26,819
$16,656
$18,337
$15,897
$16,121
$15,606
$18,239
2006-07
$1,366,170
$9,842,537
$9,560,368
$13,605,967
$12,733,258
$9,866,137
$4,681,696
$61,656,133
2005-06
$19,522
$23,899
$14,418
$16,799
$16,032
$15,153
$14,182
$16,747
TOTAL FINANCIAL AID AWARDED (Graph 17]
CAMPUS 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-06
University Ph.D $679,777 $945,600 $1,132,250
Antioch College $12,244,311 $11,479,495 $9,822,694
McGregor $8,252,524 $8,878,403 $8,275,673
New England $11,570,939 $12,565,951 $12,313,915
Seattle $12,314,524 $15,013,664 $13,963,750
LA $8,019,095 $8,763,506 $8,924,949
Santa Barbara $3,607,910 $4,046,896 $4,509,966
TOTAL $56,689,081 $61,693,514 $58,943,197
AVG. FINANCIAL AID PER STUDENT (Graph 19)
CAMPUS 2003-2004 2004-2005
University Ph.D $21,928 $19,700
Antioch College $18,385 $22,118
McGregor $14,180 $14,507
New England $17,016 $17,599
Seattle $14,303 $15,607
LA $13,850 $14,655
Santa Barbara $13,666 $14,250
Average (excl. Ph.D) $15,233 $16,456
Page 34
Graph 21: Antioch University
Total Faculty FTE (2003-2007)
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
•
~
• •….
……
……
~———–
::a
~
–
– — – – ..— –
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-07
-+- Antioch College _ University Ph.D —…- McGregor _ New England —…- Seattle __ Los Angeles –S. Barbara
Page 35
Graph 22: Antioch University
Student/Total Faculty Ratios (2003-2007)
30.0 -r————————————————,
20.0 -t—————–==—–=::————————–.————–1
15.0 +————-~.-=:…———“”””””_:::_—————————j
10.0 +—————————-“”””””‘”””=————————j
5.0 t————————————————j
0.0 +————–,———–,..—————,————–j
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-07
-+– Antioch College – University Ph.D —….-McGregor _ New England —….-Seattle –+- Los Angeles –+- S. Barbara
Page 36
Graph 23: Antioch University
Assoc.-Adjunct/Core Faculty Ratios (2003-2007)
1.20 -,————————————————,
1.00 -/————,——————————————1
0.80 L—–======:::::==~~~~;;;;;;;;:::::;:::..-::=====~—-J
0.60 -/————————————————1
0.40 -+———~”””””—————— “”———“”o,o;;::__——————-j
0.20 -/——————–=-:;;;;,.”,.=—– —-“”-….,- —1
0.00 t—- ——-;—- __….-::====;::=======~===~===~—____J
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-07
~Antioch College _ University PhD …….- McGregor _ New England …….- Seattle -+- Los Angeles -+- S. Barbara
Page 37
Graph 24 Antioch University
Percentage of Employee Compensation to Total Expenses (2003-2007)
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
::—…
—- – —-:-
— .. ~
——-.———– ————-=
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-07
–+- Antioch College – University PhD —.- McGregor – New England —.- Seattle — S. California
Page 38
~
“-
JaI TABLE 5
Ye! Employment Data Sheet
Core Faculty FTE
wII;y 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-07
W Antioch College 57.00 51.50 47.50 43.50
University Ph.D 5.25 5.25 8.25 7.75
I.- McGregor 21.10 25.00 27.00 23.00
l- New England 50.00 51.00 52.00 51.00
~
Seattle 35.00 37.52 36.80 34.20
Los Angeles 19.30 20.25 21.25 23.00
i.- Santa Barbara 9.30 10.02 10.75 9.50
‘-
196.95 200.54 203.55 191.95
Total Faculty FTE (Graph 20)
e- 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-07
~ Antioch College 64.6 60.9 67.5 51.0
University Ph.D 5.3 5.3 8.5 8.0
“- McGregor 41.1 46.2 47.9 43.4
.- New England 67.4 68.8 69.0 67.8
Seattle 49.9 56.5 53.8 51.0
i.- Los Angeles 36.7 37.6 38.5 42.4
i Santa Barbara 18.2 18.8 20.2 18.5dI1II
‘-
283.2 294.0 305.3 282.1
StudentITotal Faculty Ratios (Graph 21)
~ 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-07
(.., Antioch College 12.9 12.5 8.8 7.4
University Ph.D 12.2 16.2 11.3 14.3
(.- McGregor 22.1 19.4 18.1 19.7
‘-
New England 16.7 16.6 16.4 16.3
Seattle 25.9 23.3 23.1 23.7
.- Los Angeles 25.0 24.6 24.4 23.7
l- Santa Barbara 21.9 23.9 21.5 23.3
‘-‘ Adjunct – Associate/Core Faculty Ratio (Graph 22)
I 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-07IdIlIiI
Antioch College 0.13 0.18 0.42 0.17
“- University Ph.D 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03
t- McGregor 0.95 0.85 0.77 0.88
(.., New England 0.35 0.35 0.33 0.33
Seattle 0.35 0.51 0.46 0.49
(.- Los Angeles 0.90 0.85 0.81 0.84
‘-
Santa Barbara 0.96 0.88 0.87 0.95
…… Percentage Employee Compensation to Total Expenditures (Graph 23)
~ 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-07
Antioch College 0.73 0.72 0.73 0.61
~ University Ph.D 0.62 0.53 0.66 0.60
~ McGregor 0.68 0.68 0.71 0.67
New England 0.63 0.62 0.66 0.67
‘- Seattle 0.66 0.65 0.68 0.68
dioI Southern California 0.63 0.61 0.63 0.55
i…
~
oIlii;1 Page 39
I.-
‘viJJ,v
r r r f f r r f r f r r r f ( r f f f r ( f f r r r f’ r f r r r r r r r r f (‘ r r (, f f
APPENDICES
Antioch College: Blue
University Ph,D: Pink
McGregor: White
New England: Yellow
Seattle: Green
Southern California: Orange
r
APPENDIX 1.1
Campus Name: Antioch College
ENROLLMENT METRICS
FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 FY 2007/08
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
STUDENTDATA
UNDERGRADUATEPROGRAMS
Headcount-Total Students 836 763 597 247
Headcount-New Students 186 124 63 67
FTE-Total Students (Fall Term) 713 711 592 314
Credits-Total Students (Annual) 28,687 24,639 20,502 5,138
Ave. credit load per student 34.3 32.3 34.3 20.8
Full-Time Students (Fall Term) 469.0 376.0 224.0
Part-Time Students (Fall Term) 5.0 2.0 4.0
Graduation Rates
SA (First Time) 26.6% 40.6%
Retention Rates
SA (First Time)
After 1 Year 66.5% 58.5% 62.3%
After 2 Years 52.5% 56.5%
SA (Transfer)
After 1 Year 75.8% 71.8% 62.5%
After 2 Years 48.5% 51.3%
Ethnicity
% African American 5.4% 3.2% 3.3%
% Asian/Pacific Islander 1.0% 1.8% 1.4%
% Indian/Alaska Native 0.7% 1.0% 1.0%
% Hispanic 4.1% 2.5% 2.4%
% Caucasian 58.7% 55.3% 55.9%
% Non-resident alien 0.3% 0.2% 0.5%
% Other/Unknown 28.4% 35.2% 3.6%
% Prefer Not to Report 1.4% 0.8% 4.0%
% No Data Available 27.9%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Average Age
Undergraduate 21 21 21
Graduate
GENDER(%)
Undergraduate
Female 60.5 60.5% 58.8%
Male 39.5 39.5% 40.9%
% No Data Available 0 0.0% 0.3%
ADMISSIONS METRICS (Annual)
# of inquiries 11497 7059 3497 13709
# of applications 592 622 414 992
# of accepted students 389 343 212 507
# of new matriculants 186 124 63 67
Conversion Rate 5.1% 8.8% 11.8% 7.2%
Acceptance Rate 65.7% 55.1% 51.2% 51.1%
Yield Rate 47.8% 36.2% 29.7% 13.2%
% new matric to applications 31.4% 19.9% 15.2% 6.8%
DEFINITIONS:
HEADCOUNT: This is the unduplicated headcount for the entire academic year, Le., counting each individual
student one time during the year. Headcount does not include Leave of Absence (LOA), but it does include
Enrollment Maintenance Fee (EMF) status. Headcount does not include Continuing Education.
FTE: Full Time Equivalent – Total credits divided by the minimum number of credits/full time load.
For programs on the quarter system, this is 8 credits for graduate programs and 12 credits for undergraduate
programs.
The Fall Term’s FTE will be reported as representative of the entire academic year.
Graduation Rate: This is a program-by-program metric. It is the number of students graduating within an
individual program’s graduation period divided by the total number of students who had entered the program
at the start of that period.
Retention Rate: The number of students remaining in a program after 1 year and 2 years divided by the
total number of students who had entered the program at the start of those periods.
Conversion Rate: The number of applicants divided by the number of inquiries
Acceptance Rate: The number of acceptances divided by the number of applicants
Yield Rate: The number of those enrolled (matriculated) divided by the number of acceptances
‘-‘
~
t..,
l.
t:
~
i.-
APPENDIX 1.2
Campus Name: Antioch College
REVENUE AND EXPENSE METRICS
FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07 FY 2007/08
ACTUAL ACTUAL PRELIMINAR’V BUDGET
Tuition and Fees(net of discounts) $7,681,690 $6,587,377 $6,016,631 $4,655,694
Total Unrestricted Revenue (Fund 1) $15,297,178 $15,682,385 $ 14,483,799 $12,519,770
Total Unrestricted Expense (Fund 1) $15,149,727 $16,815,603 $18,161,899 $15,992,288
Net Fund 1 Revenue (Deficit) $147,451 -$1,133,218 -$3,678,100 -$3,472,518
Total Restricted Revenue (Fund 2)· $3,667,059 $2,774,934 $ 3,274,180 $ 3,146,831
Total Restricted Expense (Fund 2) $3,814,968 $3,085,631 $ 2,052,478 $ 1,728,210
Net Fund 2 Revenue (Deficit) -$147,909 -$310,697 $1,221,702 $1,418,621
Total Fund 1 & 2 Net Revenue ($458) ($1,443,915) ($2,456,398) ($2,053,897)
Other cash expenditures ($181,939) $1,039,013 ($749,553) $0
Net Cash excess (shortfall) $181,481 ($2,482,928) ($1,706,845) ($2,053,897)
Unduplicated Student Headcount 763 597 377 247
Ratios and Metrics (based on Fund 1 only)
Tuition & Fees as a % of Total Rev 40.5% 35.7% 33.9% 29.7%
Average Tuition & Fees per Student $10,068 $11,034 $15,959 $18,849
Average Revenue per Student $24,855 $30,917 $47,103 $63,428
Average Expenses per Student $24,855 $33,335 $53,619 $71,743
·Does not include unexpended restricted revenue. Restricted revenue is only included once it has
been expended and released from restriction. It then becomes part of the unrestricted operating
funds of the University
‘-‘
‘
‘
~
(..
‘
~
APPENDIX 1.3
Campus Name: Antioch College
DEVELOPMENT METRICS
FY 2003/04 FY 2004105 FY 2005/06 FY2006/07
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL PRELIMINARY
Gift Revenue Dollars
Endowment $356,839 $212,485 $310,214 $180,005
Scholarship $162,110 $191,464 $176,490 $127,954
Other restricted $1,001,281 $6,154,520 $593,499 $129,642
Unrestricted $1,709,826 $1,306,801 $1,716,644 $1,366,167
Total $3,230,056 $7,865,269 $2,796,847 $1,803,768
Designation
% endowment 11.0% 2.7% 11.1% 10.0%
% scholarships 5.0% 2.4% 6.3% 7.1%
% other restricted 31.0% 78.2% 21.2% 7.2%
% unrestricted 52.9% 16.6% 61.4% 75.7%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Gifts-in-Kind
$ Value $12,416 $16,885 $ $ 62,789
Total Gift Revenue
Total $ and in-kind gifts $3,242,472 $7,882,154 $2,796,847 $1,866,557
% Annual Growth -15.5% 143.1% -64.5% -33.3%
Grants and Contracts
Federal $1,356,708 $1,249,750 $ 1,145,718 $ 1,140,988
State $34,355 $41,431 $ 86,975 $ 79,125
Private $88,563 $312,322 $ 920,410 $ 238,997
Total $ received $1,479,626 $1,603,503 $2,153,103 $1,459,111
% Annual Growth 10.6% 8.4% 34.3% -32.2%
Endowment Fund
Total gift $ received $356,839 $212,485 $310,214 $180,005
% Annual Growth 573.1% -40.5% 46.0% -42.0%
Fund Balance $29,237,272 $29,527,319 $19,654,545 $19,936,005
Interest & dividends earned $964,114 $961,246 $1,218,188 $1,327,885
Rate of Return 3.3% 3.3% 6.2% 6.7%
DEFINITIONS
Gift Revenue:
Endowment-Gifts designated by the donor for the individual campus endowment fund.
Endowment gifts are recorded centrally in Oatatel in Fund #4, campus 80.
Scholarship-Gifts designated by the donor for scholarships for students of the campus.
Scholarship gifts are recorded in cost centers 81000-81999, 83000-83999
and 84000-84999 in the individual campuses.
Other Restricted-Gifts with use restricted by the donor to specific purposes other than endowment or scholarship.
Other Unrestricted-Gifts not restricted by the donor to a specific fund or purpose.
;
“-
Gifts-in-kind:
Gifts received other than in cash, such as goods or services.
Endowment Funds:
Endowment funds managed centrally in Fund #4, but maintained for use by individual campuses.
Gifts to the endowment funds are recorded in Datatel under line item #4100-4120 in the cost
center used for that particular fund in Campus 80.
Scholarship and other restricted funds:
Funds outstanding which have not been released for use as of the reporting date, designated
by donors for specific purposes such as scholarships or for purposes other than endowment.
t.-
‘-
‘-
‘-‘
“- APPENDIX 1.4
…. Campus Name: Antioch College
“-‘ FINANCIAL AID METRICS…… FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07
“- SEOG
‘- $ Awarded $766,644 $720,994 $728,525 $621,137
‘-‘ # of students 319 278 217 215
‘-
% of students 38.6% 36.4% 36.3% 57.0%
Ave $ received per student $2,403 $2,594 $3,357 $2,889
I.- Pel! Grants
I..a.v $ Awarded $661,983 $613,749 $417,938 $344,824
# of students 254 227 164 133
(…, % of students 30.7% 29.8% 27.5% 35.3%
(.- Ave $ received per student $2,606 $2,704 $2,548 $2,593
Stafford Loans-Subsidized
.- $ Awarded $1,354,105 $1,195,059 $1,060,830 $805,786
~ # of students 404 346 281 220
% of students 48.9% 45.3% 47.1% 58.4%
‘-‘ Ave $ received per student $3,352 $3,454 $3,775 $3,663
“- Stafford Loans-Unsubsidized
.- $ Awarded $241,369 $295,333 $366,150 $369,541
# of students 70 87 107 108
iiIIII# % of students 8.5% 11.4% 17.9% 28.6%
‘-”
Ave $ received per student $3,448 $3,395 $3,422 $3,422
Perkins Loans
”’-t $ Awarded $163,499 $224,815 $164,479 $270,865
-. # of students 127 166 111 157
% of students 15.4% 21.8% 18.6% 41.6%
‘-‘ Ave $ received per student $1,287 $1,354 $1,482 $1,725
“- Alternative Loans
$ Awarded $120,665 $190,011 $176,967 $300,913
‘- # of students 20 22 21 29
‘- % of students 2.4% 2.9% 3.5% 7.7%
‘-
Ave $ received per student $6,033 $8,637 $8,427 $10,376
Plus Loans
‘-t $ Awarded $1,021,223 $904,624 $774,121 $1,427,051
(…, # of students 93 77 75 147
% of students 11.2% 10.1% 12.6% 39.0%
I.-. Ave $ received per student $10,981 $11,748 $10,322 $9,708
‘-‘ Work Study-Federal
$ Awarded $848,288 $811,087 $659,483 $804,650
‘- # of students 415 348 252 202
……., % of students 50.2% 45.6% 42.2% 53.6%
Ave $ received per student $2,044 $2,331 $2,617 $3,983
‘- Work Study-State
‘-‘ $ Awarded 0
# of students 0
‘- % of students 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
~ Ave $ received per student $0 $0
‘-
‘-
~
‘-
.. ..i”,
‘
‘
~
‘-‘
‘
‘
‘-‘
,.–
‘
.,.
“‘-‘
~
..
Other Federal Aid
$ Awarded $16,139 $10,821 $0 $53,841
# of students 7 4 0 24
% of students 0.8% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0%
Ave $ received per student $2,306 $2,705 $0 $0
Other State Aid
$ Awarded $354,805 $395,462 $257,816 $176,371
# of students 181 172 141 115
% of students 21.9% 22.5% 23.6% 30.5%
Ave $ received per student $1,960 $2,299 $1,828 $1,534
Institutional Scholarship
$ Awarded $6,613,545 $6,022,410 $5,058,525 $4,289,340
# of students 656 506 400 351
% of students 79.3% 66.3% 67.0% 93.1%
Ave $ received per student $10,082 $11,902 $12,646 $12,220
Other Financial Aid
$ Awarded $82,046 $95,130 $157,860 $378,218
# of students 40 37 82 118
% of students 4.8% 4.8% 13.7% 31.3%
Ave $ received per student $2,051 $2,571 $1,925 $3,205
Total Financial Aid
$ Awarded $12,244,311 $11,479,495 $9,822,694 $9,842,537
# of students· 666 519 411 367
% of students·· 80.5% 68.0% 68.8% 97.3%
Ave $ received per student $18,385 $22,118 $23,899 $26,819
* Unduplicated # of students
**Based on annual unduplicated headcount
Annual Unduplicated Headcount 827 763 597 377
(per above)
FINANCIAL AID DEFINITIONS
Total Students: The annual unduplicated headcount for the campus
$ Awarded: The sum of dollars awarded to students for each academic period of the yer per Report EXPL
# of Students: The sum of total students (unduplicated) receiving awards per Report EXPL
% of Students: The # of students receiving awards divided by the Total Students (unduplicated)
Average $ received per Student: The $ Awarded divided by the # of Students
3rd Party: Scholarships or payments received from employers and other outside non-Federal, non-State
entities. Third Party payments are included in “Other Financial Aid.”
<-
I...,
I...,
'-
~ APPENDIX 1.5
, Campus Name: Antioch College
"'"'- Employment Metricst- FY 2003/04 FY 2004105 FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07
"- ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL PRELIMINARY
~ FACULTYFTE
<- Core Faculty FTE 57.0 51.5 47.5 43.5
~ Associate Faculty FTE 0.9 2.0 2.0 2.0
Adjunct Faculty FTE 6.7 7.4 18.0 5.5
r.- TOTAL FACULTY FTE 64.6 60.9 67.5 51.0
(.,
(., ADMINISTRATOR/STAFF FTE
Administrator FTE 56.8 54.3 55.5 59.3
r.... Administrative Associate FTE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
(.- Unionized Staff FTE 75.0 68.3 67.5 65.5
Non-Union Staff FTE 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
r.- TOTAL ADMIN. & STAFF FTE 132.8 123.6 124.0 125.8
(.,
(.., TOTAL CAMPUS FTE 197.4 184.5 191.5 176.8
(.., RATIOS:
, Unduplicated Student Headcount 836 763 597 377
~ Student/Core Faculty Ratio 14.7 14.8 12.6 8.7
r.- StudentITotal Faculty Ratio 12.9 12.5 8.8 7.4
"-
Student/Admin & Staff Ratio 6.3 6.2 4.8 3.0
(.., Adjunct - Associate/Core Faculty 0.13 0.18 0.42 0.17
"- Average Core Faculty Salary $45,129 $45,152 $48,722 $50,788
"- Average Administrator Salary $38,466 $39,851 $43,484 $44,296
'-
Average Admin. Associate Salary $0 $0 $0 $0
Average Union Annual Wages $27,644 $28,426 $29,199 $29,771
.aI Average Non Union Staff Salary $27,851 $27,851 $29,286 $29,578
'-
'-
Total Campus Salaries $8,332,188 $8,054,875 $8,409,697 $8.174,908
Total Campus Benefits $2,961,844 $2,903,400 $3,099,488 $2,952,343
t- Ratio of Benefits to Salaries 0.36 0.36 0.37 0.36
"- Total Expenditures (Fund 1 Only) $15,546,837 $15,149,727 $15,804,742 $18,161,898
"- Ratio of Salaries & Benefits to Expenditures 0.73 0.72 0.73 0.61
t- Gender Information
"- Core FacuIty
~ Female (%) 54.4% 51.9% 50.0% 52.3%
'-
Mate (%) 45.6% 48.1% 50.0% 47.7%
Non-Faculty Staff
(.., Female (%) 65.2% 66.4% 50.0% 60.9%
'-
Male (%j 34.8% 33.6% 50.0% 39.1%
(.,
r.-
'-
(.,
~
~
l.
I
(....,
~
"
(.,
l
~
t
i.
~
t.
I
~
'-'
'
~
~
i.
I-.,
'
~
'
r-
t
e
t;.,
l.-
'
'
-
'
--
.-
'
'
~
(.,
(,..,
<.:t
Ethnicity Information
Core Faculty
% African American 8.7% 5.8% 4.3% 4.5%
% Asian/Pacific Islander 1.8% 1.9% 2.2% 2.3%
% Indian/Alaska Native 1.8% 1.9% 2.2% 0.0%
% Hispanic 3.5% 3.8% 4.3% 4.5%
% Caucasian 84.2% 86.6% 87.0% 88.7%
% Non-resident alien 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% Other/Unknown 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% Prefer Not to Report 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Staff
% African American 15.9% 18.8% 16.9% 16.4%
% Asian/Pacific Islander 0.0% 1.6% 0.8% 0.8%
% Indian/Alaska Native 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% Hispanic 2.2% 0.8% 0.0% 1.5%
% Caucasian 81.9% 70.3% 82.3% 80.5%
% Non-resident alien 0.0% 8.5% 0.0% 0.8%
% Other/Unknown 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% Prefer Not to Report 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
DEFINITIONS
Employee numbers are for hired employees only (those for whom we collect payroll taxes); they do not
include work-study students, part-time temporaries, employees from temporary agencies, or those
on personal service contracts (a.k.a. "independent contractors"). All reporting and measurements are to be for
Fund 1 employees only.
Core Faculty: Benefited faculty positions (as budgeted in Datatel Accounting Line 5100)
Administrator: Deans, directors, & senior level admin/technical (budgeted in Datatel Accounting Line 5130)
Admin Associates: Salaried mid-level staff positions (budgeted in Datatel Accounting Line 5140)
Union Staff: Represented wage employees (budgeted in Datatel Accounting Line 5160)
Non-Union Staff: Hourly compensated (budgeted in Datatel Accounting Line 5170)
Note: All personnel FTE will be calculated according to the categories in which they are budgeted.
If a person is split between two categories, then that person's FTE will be calculated consistently (e.g., 0.8 FTE
core faculty, 0.2 administrator).
All employment measures are to be made at the commencement of the Fall Term and will be
consistent with the data collected for the November IPEDS census report
Total Salaries and Benefits may be taken from the Datatel FSRP reports.
APPENDIX 2.1
Campus Name: Ph.D in Leadership and Change
STUDENT DATA
DOCTORAL PROGRAMS
Headcount-Total Students 64 85 96 114 125
Headcount-New Students 26 27 23 28 27
FTE-Total Students (Fall Term) 64 85 96 114 125
Total Headcount (Fall Term) 64 85 96 114 125
Full Time (Fall Term) 114 125
Part-Time (Fall Term)
Credits-Total Students (Annual) 234.0 596.0 923.0 1075.0 1188.0
Ave. credit load per student 3.7 7.0 9.6 9.4 9.5
Graduation Rates NA NA NA NA NA *
Ph.D Leadership
Retention Rates 1 year 92.0% 93.0% 91.0% 93.0%
Retention Rates 2 years 91.0%
Ethnicity
% African American 17.0% 16.0% 15.0% 17.5% 19.0%
% Asian/Pacific Islander 1.5% 2.0% 2.0% 2.6% 4.0%
% Indian/Alaska Native 1.5% 1.0% 1.0% 3.5% 3.0%
% Hispanic 1.5% 1.0% 2.0% 1.7% 2.0%
% Caucasian 78.5% 80.0% 70.0% 69.3% 68.0%
% Non-resident alien 2.0% 3.4% 3.0%
% Other/Unknown 1.0% 1.0%
% Prefer Not to Report 8.0% 1.0%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Average Age
Graduate 48 45 45 49 50
GENDER (%)
Graduate
Female 66 63.0% 64.0% 64.0% 63.0%
Male 34 37.0% 36.0% 36.0% 37.0%
ADMISSIONS METRICS (Annual)
# of inquiries 796 640 685 704 605
# of applications 48 57 58 60 63
# of accepted students 34 32 37 39 39
# of new matriculants 26 27 23 28 27
Conversion Rate 6% 9% 8% 9% 10%
Acceptance Rate 71% 56% 64% 65% 62%
Yield Rate 76% 84% 62% 72% 69%
% new matric to applications 54% 47% 40% 47% 43%
FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07 FY 2007/08
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2004/05
ACTUAL
ENROLLMENT METRICS
FY 2003/04
ACTUAL
DEFINITIONS:
HEADCOUNT: This is the unduplicated headcount for the entire academic year, i.e., counting each individual
student one time during the year. Headcount does not include Leave of Absence (LOA), but it does include
Enrollment Maintenance Fee (EMF) status. Headcount does not include Continuing Education.
FTE: Full Time Equivalent - Total credits divided by the minimum number of credits/full time load.
For programs on the quarter system, this is 8 credits for graduate programs and 12 credits for undergraduate
programs. Programs on the semester system are to convert semester credits to quarter credits, multiplying by
3/2, and then use the 8 or 12 divisors. The Fall Term's FTE will be reported as representative of the entire
academic year.
Graduation Rate: This is a program-by-program metric. It is the number of students graduating within an
individual program's graduation period divided by the total number of students who had entered the program
at the start of that period.
Retention Rate: The number of students remaining in a program after 1 year and 2 years divided by the total
number of students who had entered the program at the start of those periods.
Conversion Rate: The number of applicants divided by the number of inquiries
Acceptance Rate: The number of acceptances divided by the number of applicants
Yield Rate: The number of those enrolled (matriculated) divided by the number of acceptances
* The Program's graduation rate metric is 7 years.
APPENDIX 2.2
Campus Name: Ph.D in Leadership and Change
REVENUE AND EXPENSE METRICS
FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07 FY 2007/08
ACTUAL ACTUAL PRELIM. BUDGET
Tuition and Fees(net of discounts) $1,325,940 $1,541,840 $1,826,712 $2,022,150
Total Unrestricted Revenue (Fund 1) $1,331,919 $1,542,190 $1,829,661 $2,078,393
Total Unrestricted Expense (Fund 1) $1,291,694 $1,469,501 $1,704,560 $2,078,393
Net Fund 1 Revenue (Deficit) $40,225 $72,689 $125,101 $0
Total Restricted Revenue (Fund 2)* $8,551 $2,875 $19,758 $0
Total Restricted Expense (Fund 2) $8,551 $2,609 $18,500 $0
Net Fund 2 Revenue (Deficit) $0 $266 $1,258 $0
Total Fund 1 & 2 Net Revenue $40,225 $72,955 $126,359 $0
Other cash expenditures $12,507 ($8,542) $71 ($3,000)
Net Cash excess (shortfall) $27,718 $81,497 $126,288 $3,000
Unduplicated Student Headcount 85 96 114 125
Ratios and Metrics (based on Fund 1 only)
Tuition & Fees as a % of Total Rev 98.9% 99.8% 98.8% 97.3%
Average Tuition Paid per Student $15,599 $16,061 $16,024 $16,177
Average Revenue per Student $15,670 $16,064 $16,050 $16,627
Average Expenses per Student $15,196 $15,307 $14,952 $16,627
*Does not include unexpended restricted revenue. Restricted revenue is only included once it has been
expended and released from restriction. It then becomes part of the unrestricted operating funds of the
University.
r."
-
~
~
~ APPENDIX 2.3
~ Campus Name: Ph.D in Leadership and Change
(.,
FINANCIAL AID METRICS
l.- FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07
'-'
l.-
SEOG
$ Awarded
I.v # of students
'-'
% of students 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Ave $ received per student
'- Pell Grants
l-.. $ Awarded
# of students
'-' % of students 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
(..., Ave $ received per student
Stafford Loans-Subsidized
(...., $ Awarded $222,054 $321,788 $386,101 $434,675
(,., # of students 29 43 49 67
~
% of students 45.3% 50.6% 51.0% 58.8%
Ave $ received per student $7,657 $7,483 $7,880 $6,488
G.. Stafford Loans-Unsubsidized
~ $ Awarded $309,361 $487,562 $575,399 $648,916
# of students 29 46 54 79
~ % of students 45.3% 54.1% 56.3% 69.3%
r.- Ave $ received per student $10,668 $10,599 $10,656 $8,214
Perkins Loans
r.- $ Awarded $146,362 $102,000 $125,000 $144,738
.' # of students 25 17 23 28..,
~
% of students 39.1% 20.0% 24.0% 24.6%
Ave $ received per student $5,854 $6,000 $5,435 $5,169
"- Alternative Loans
$ Awarded $8,000
~ # of students 1
'-' % of students 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9%
~
Ave $ received per student $8,000
Plus Loans
~ $ Awarded $104,241
~ # of students 5
% of students 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.4%
~ Ave $ received per student $26,060
(.. Work Study-Federal
$ Awarded
~ # of students 0.00%
'- % of students 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
"-
Ave $ received per student
Work Study-State
I
$ Awarded~
e- # of students 0.00%
% of students 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
~ Ave $ received per student
,.
~
(..
~
(..,
(...,.
'-'
~
'-'
~
l.
l.
~
~
t
t..,
'
'-'
C
(..,
Other Federal Aid
$ Awarded
# of students
% of students 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Ave $ received per student
Other State Aid
$ Awarded
# of students
% of students 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Ave $ received per student
Institutional Scholarship
$ Awarded $18,500
# of students 8
% of students 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.0%
Ave $ received per student $2,313
Other Financial Aid
$ Awarded $2,000 $34,250 $45,750 $7,100
# of students 1 4 5 1
% of students 1.6% 4.7% 5.2% 0.9%
Ave $ received per student $2,000 $8,563 $9,150 $7,100
Total Financial Aid
$ Awarded $679,777 $945,600 $1,132,250 $1,366,170
# of students· 31 48 58 58
% of students·· 48.4% 56.5% 60.4% 50.9%
Ave $ received per student $21,928 $19,700 $19,522 $23,555
*Unduplicated # of students
**Based on annual unduplicated headcount
Annual Unduplicated Headcount 64 85 96 114
(per above)
FINANCIAL AID DEFINITIONS
Total Students: The annual unduplicated headcount for the campus
$ Awarded: The sum of dollars awarded to students for each academic period of the yer per Report EXPL
# of Students: The sum of total students (unduplicated) receiving awards per Report EXPL
% of Students: The # of students receiving awards divided by the Total Students (unduplicated)
Average $ received per Student: The $ Awarded divided by the # of Students
3rd Party: Scholarships or payments received from employers and other outside non-Federal, non-State
entities. Third Party payments are included in "Other Financial Aid."
~
~
~
~
~ APPENDIX 2.4
,MI Campus Name: Ph.D in Leadership and Change
i...w Employment Metrics
'-' FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07 FY 2007/08
~ ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
'- FACULTVFTE
I
Core Faculty FTE 5.25 5.25 8.25 7.75 8.25.-
t.- Associate Faculty FTE 0.25 0.25
i
Adjunct Faculty FTE
~ TOTAL FACUL TV FTE 5.25 5.25 8.50 8.00 8.25
'-
" ADMINISTRATOR/STAFF FTE
-t Administrator FTE 1.25 1.25 1.25 2.10 1.80
i Administrative Associate FTE'di1
"-
Unionized Staff FTE
Non-Union Staff FTE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
l.- TOTAL ADMIN. & STAFF FTE 2.25 2.25 2.25 3.10 2.80
">JJIII/
.’ TOTAL CAMPUS FTE 7.50 7.50 10.75 11.10 11.05
~
~ RATIOS:
t-
Unduplicated Student Headcount 64 85 96 114 125
Student/Core Faculty Ratio 12.2 16.2 11.6 14.7 15.2
~ Student/Total Faculty Ratio 12.2 16.2 11.3 14.3 15.2
‘-
Student/Admin & Staff Ratio 28.4 37.8 42.7 36.8 44.6
l-. Adjunct – Associate/Core Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00
C- Average Core Faculty Salary $76,207 $83,000 $84,500 $84,610 $89,274I
‘-‘ Average Administrator Salary $42,756 $46,000 $49,267 $56,220 $66,596
‘-‘ Average Admin. Associate Salary
~
Average Union Annual Wages
Average Non Union Staff Salary $24,528 $29,089 $32,467 $35,006 $36,400
~
,. Total Campus Salaries $496,484 $540,591 $755,784 $799,054 $937,148
‘-‘ Total Campus Benefits $135,065 $143,968 $206,816 $215,744 $304,899
r- Ratio of Benefits to Salaries 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.33
i.- Total Expenditures (Fund 1 Only) $1,022,877 $1,291,694 $1,469,501 $1,704,560 $2,078,393
‘- Ratio of Salaries & Benefits to
“-
Expenditures 0.62 0.53 0.66 0.60 0.60
‘- Gender Information
~ Core Faculty
~
Female (%) 43.0% 43.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%Male (%) 57.0% 57.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
“- Non-Faculty Staff
‘-‘
Female (%) 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
eI
l…,
~
‘-
DEFINITIONS
Employee numbers are for hired employees only (those for whom we collect payroll taxes); they do not
include work-study students, part-time temporaries, employees from temporary agencies, or those
on personal service contracts (a.k.a. “independent contractors”). All reporting and measurements are to be for
Fund 1 employees only.
Male (%)
Ethnicity Information
Core Faculty
% African American
% Asian/Pacific Islander
% Indian/Alaska Native
% Hispanic
% Caucasian
% Non-resident alien
% Other/Unknown
% Prefer Not to Report
Total
Staff
% African American
% Asian/Pacific Islander
% Indian/Alaska Native
% Hispanic
% Caucasian
% Non-resident alien
% Other/Unknown
% Prefer Not to Report
Total
14.0%
86.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
14.0%
86.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
10.0%
80.0%
10.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
10.0%
80.0%
10.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
10.0%
80.0%
10.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
~
~
~
‘-‘
~
‘-
~
~
~
i.
~
i.w
~
I..v
~
Core Faculty: Benefited faculty positions (as budgeted in Datatel Accounting Line 5100)
Administrator: Deans, directors, & senior level admin/technical (budgeted in Datatel Accounting Line 5130)
Admin Associates: Salaried mid-level staff positions (budgeted in Datatel Accounting Line 5140)
Union Staff: Represented wage employees (budgeted in Datatel Accounting Line 5160)
Non-Union Staff: Hourly compensated (budgeted in Datatel Accounting Line 5170)
Note: All personnel FTE will be calculated according to the categories in which they are budgeted.
If a person is split between two categories, then that person’s FTE will be calculated consistently (e.g., 0.8 FTE
core faculty, 0.2 administrator).
All employment measures are to be made at the commencement of the Fall Term and will be
consistent with the data collected for the November IPEDS census report
Total Salaries and Benefits may be taken from the Datatel FSRP reports.
APPENDIX 3.1
Campus Name: McGregor
ENROLLMENT METRICS
FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07 FY 2007/08
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
STUDENT DATA
UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMS
Headcount-Total Students 233 219 223 219
Headcount-New Students 53 81 79 80
FTE-Total Students (Fall Term) 120 104 118 132
Total Credits (Annual) 5054 4756.5 5174 5184
Full Time Students (Fall) 63 57 56
Part Time Students (Fall) 99 95 104
Ave. credit load per studentlYr 22.9 21.7 23.2 23.7
Total Headcount (Fall Term) 162.0 152.0 160.0
Graduation Rates
BA Completion 42.0% 35.0% 32.0%
Retention Rates
BA Completion
After 1 Year 81.0% 80.0% 57.0%
After 2 Years 64.0% 62.0% 54.0%
MASTERS PROGRAMS
Headcount- Total Students 663 646 641 679
Headcount-New Students 243 231 236 284
FTE-Total Students (Fall Term) 535 646 595 605
Total Credits (Annual) 16025 14630 14582 15976
Full Time Students – Fall 371 338 304
Part Time Students – Fall 204 205 215
Ave. credit load per student 25.4 22.6 22.7 23.5
Total Headcount (Fall Term) 575.0 543.0 519.0
Graduation Rates
Graduate Management 77.0% 75.0% 62.0%
Conflict Resolution 77.0% 62.0% 74.0%
Community College Mgt 0.0% 89.0% 86.0%
Individualized Liberal & Prof Stud 45.0% 47.0% 50.0%
Teacher Licensure 84.0% 78.0% 67.0%
Leadership 79.0% 82.0% 84.0%
Retention Rates
Graduate Management
After 1 Year 88.0% 93.0% 67.0%
After 2 Years 81.0% 89.0% 62.0%
Conflict Resolution
After 1 Year 82.0% 79.0% 69.0%
After 2 Years 81.0% 74.0% 63.0%
Community College Management
After 1 Year 0.0% 89.0% 100.0%
After 2 Years 0.0% 89.0% 100.0%
78.0% 69.0%
50.0% 63.0%
92.0% 86.0%
83.0% 82.0%
95.0% 84.0%
865 856 898
26.3% 27.4%
1.0% 0.7%
0.4% 1.0%
1.3% 1.5%
68.0% 65.7%
0.4% 0.0%
2.6% 3.7%
0.0% 0.0%
100.0% 100.0%
41 41
39 38
88.0%
85.0%
98.0%
40
39
896
23.0%
0.8%
0.4%
1.5%
70.0%
0.4%
3.9%
0.0%
100.0%
Individualized Liberal &
Prof Studies
After 1 Year 75.0%
After 2 Years 50.0%
Teacher Licensure
After I Year
After 2 Years
Leadership
After 1 Year
Ethnicity
% African American
% AsianlPacific Islander
% Indian/Alaska Native
% Hispanic
% Caucasian
% Non-resident alien
% Other/Unknown
% Prefer Not to Report
Total
Average Age
Undergraduate
Graduate
TOTAL UNDUPLICA TED
HEADCOUNT (Annual)
GENDER(%)
Undergraduate
Female
Male
Graduate
Female
Male
ADMISSIONS METRICS (Annual)
# of inquiries
# of applications
# of accepted students
# of new matriculants
Conversion Rate
Acceptance Rate
Yield Rate
% new matric to applications
74% 68% 69%
26% 32% 31%
74% 73% 74%
26% 27% 26%
2210 2331 2350
490 488 546
403 414 426
361 405 409
17.0% 21% 23%
85.0% 85% 78%
96.0% 98% 96%
81.0% 83% 75%
DEFINITIONS:
HEADCOUNT: This is the unduplicated headcount for the entire academic year, i.e., counting each individual
student one time during the year. Headcount does not include Leave of Absence (LOA), but it does include
Enrollment Maintenance Fee (EMF) status. Headcount does not include Continuing Education.
NOTE: The total annual unduplicated headcount may not equate to the sum ofthe headcounts in
individual programs because of double counting of students who move from one program to another
during the same academic year.
FTE: Full Time Equivalent – Total credits divided by the minimum number of credits/full time load.
For programs on the quarter system, this is 8 credits for graduate programs and 12 credits for undergraduate
programs. Programs on the semester system are to convert semester credits to quarter credits, multiplying by
3/2, and then use the 8 or 12 divisors. The Fall Term’s FTE will be reported as representative of the entire
academic year.
Graduation Rate: This is a program-by-program metric. It is the number of students graduating within an
individual program’s graduation period divided by the total number of students who had entered the program
at the start of that period.
Retention Rate: The number of students remaining in a program after 1 year and 2 years divided by the total
number of students who had entered the program at the start of those periods.
Conversion Rate: The number of applicants divided by the number of inquiries
Acceptance Rate: The number of acceptances divided by the number of applicants
Yield Rate: The number of those enrolled (matriculated) divided by the number of acceptances
APPENDIX 3.2
Campus Name: McGregor
REVENUE AND EXPENSE METRICS
FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07 FY 2007/08
ACTUAL ACTUAL PRELIM. BUDGET
Tuition and Fees(net of discounts) $7,042.123 $6,840,560 $7,152,695 $8.054,007
Total Unrestricted Revenue (Fund 1) $7,055.229 $6,991,886 $7,870,492 $8,149,052
Total Unrestricted Expense (Fund 1) $6,987,780 $7,167.387 $7,703,945 $7,975,052
Net Fund 1 Revenue (Deficit) $67,449 ($175,501) $166,547 $174,000
Total Restricted Revenue (Fund 2)* $96,999 $413,440 $334.619 $114,845
Total Restricted Expense (Fund 2) $98,785 $229,366 $342,479 $114,845
Net Fund 2 Revenue (Deficit) ($1,786) $184,074 ($7,860) $0
Total Fund 1 & 2 Net Revenue $65,663 $8,573 $158,687 $174,000
Other cash expenditures** ($58,220) ($11,596,536) $9,209,714 $1,065,676
Net Cash excess (shortfall) $123,883 $11,605,109 ($9,051,027) ($891,676)
Unduplicated Student Headcount 909 896 865 856
Ratios and Metrics (based on Fund 1 only)
Tuition & Fees as a % of Total Rev 98.5% 92.4% 87.2% 97.5%
Average Tuition Paid per Student $7,747 $7.635 $8,269 $9,409
Average Revenue per Student $7,762 $7,803 $9,099 $9,520
Average Expenses per Student $7,687 $7,999 $8,906 $9,317
*Does not include unexpended restricted revenue. Restricted revenue is only included once it has been
expended and released from restriction. It then becomes part of the unrestricted operating funds of the
University.
**”Other Cash Expenditures” reflect cash inflows in 2005-06 and cash outflows in 2006/07 and 2007/08
related to the Campus West construction project. FY 2007/08 reflect current year project
expenditures to date.
APPENDIX 3.3
Campus Name: McGregor
DEVELOPMENT METRICS
FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL
Gift Revenue Dollars
Endowment $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000
Scholarship $34,581 $7,955 $8,840 $8,000
Other restricted $0 $643,580 $1,251,862 $1,558,447
Unrestricted $12,123 $1,868 $9,015 $2,310
Total $49,704 $656,403 $1,272,717 $1,571,757
Gifts-in-Kind $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Gift Revenue $49,704 $656,403 $1,272,717 $1,571,757
Grants and Contracts $89,383 $185,000 $185,000 $185,000
Endowment Fund
Total gift $ received $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000
Fund Balance $18,600 $21,600 $24,600 $27,600
Total Restricted Funds $154,919 $836,535 $1,445,702 $1,764,757
(other than endowment)
‘-” “‘Development metrics include both restricted and unrestricted revenue.
DEFINITIONS
Gift Revenue:
Endowment-Gifts designated by the donor for the individual campus endowment fund.
Endowment gifts are recorded centrally in Datatel in Fund #4, campus 80.
Scholarship-Gifts designated by the donor for scholarships for students of the campus.
Scholarship gifts are recorded in cost centers 81000-81999, 83000-83999 and 84000-84999 in the individual campuses.
Other Restricted-Gifts with use restricted by the donor to specific purposes other than endowment or scholarship.
Other Unrestricted-Gifts not restricted by the donor to a specific fund or purpose.
Gifts-in-kind:
Gifts received other than in cash, such as goods or services.
Endowment Funds:
Endowment funds managed centrally in Fund #4, but maintained for use by individual campuses.
Gifts to the endowment funds are recorded in Datatel under line item #4100-4120 in the cost
center usedfor that particular fund in Campus 80.
Scholarship and other restricted funds:
Funds outstanding which have not been released for use as of the reporting date, designated
by donors for specific purposes such as scholarships or for purposes other than endowment.
e-
i.-
~
l..v
.w APPENDIX 3.4
l_ Campus Name: McGregor
“- FINANCIAL AID METRICS
…., FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07
‘-
i..-
SEOG
$ Awarded $15,793 $9,335 $21,777 $31,687
~ # of students 42 27 64 69
-, % of students 4.6% 3.0% 7.4% 8.1%
Ave $ received per student $376 $346 $340 $459
“- Pell Grants
~ $ Awarded $175,211 $154,445 $140,806 $177,978
# of students 77 73 65 69
l..– % of students 8.5% 8.1% 7.5% 8.1%
‘-‘ Ave $ received per student $2,275 $2,116 $2,166 $2,579
Stafford Loans-Subsidized
i.- $ Awarded $3,598,446 $3,909,613 $3,600,444 $4,013,694
i.., # of students 533 557 517 83
% of students 58.6% 62.2% 59.8% 9.7%., Ave $ received per student $6,751 $7,019 $6,964 $48,358
<-- Stafford Loans-Unsubsidized
- $ Awarded $3,846,368 $4,287,182 $3,933,359 $4,370,762
# of students 504 547 507 564
~ % of students 55.4% 61.0% 58.6% 65.9%
~
Ave $ received per student $7,632 $7,838 $7,758 $7,750
Perkins Loans
low $ Awarded $151,428 $116,697 $111,500 $178,902
(.." # of students 29 26 26 39
% of students 3.2% 2.9% 3.0% 4.6%
I..- Ave $ received per student $5,222 $4,488 $4,288 $4,587
...., Alternative Loans
$ Awarded $0 $0 $47,000 $47,079
"-" # of students 0 0 4 4
tIiII % of students 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.5%
(,., Ave $ received per student $11,750 $11,770
Plus Loans
~ $ Awarded $0 $0 $0 $251,612
l.- # of students 0 0 0 23
% of students 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7%
~ Ave $ received per student $10,940
arI Work Study-Federal
$ Awarded $5,750 $9,703 $10,500 $8,923
l..v # of students 2 3 3 3
i.- % of students 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 0.4%
-
Ave $ received per student $2,875 $3,234 $3,500 $2,974
Work Study-State
I..v $ Awarded $0 $0 $0 $0
'-'
# of students 0 0 0 0
% of students 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
(,.; Ave $ received per student
~
:...
i.-
..,
Other Federal Aid
$ Awarded $316,325 $253,876 $229,108 $0
# of students 66 68 49 0
% of students 7.3% 7.6% 5.7% 0.0%
Ave $ received per student $4,793 $3,733 $4,676
Other State Aid
$ Awarded $122,277 $93,792 $101,253 $118,938
# of students 134 115 111 137
% of students 14.7% 12.8% 12.8% 16.0%
Ave $ received per student $913 $816 $912 $868
Institutional Scholarship
$ Awarded $20,926 $32,000 $20,000 $0
# of students 10 16 10 0
% of students 1.1% 1.8% 1.2% 0.0%
Ave $ received per student $2,093 $2,000 $2,000
Other Financial Aid
$ Awarded $0 $11,760 $59,926 $360,793
# of students 0 1 12 77
% of students 0.0% 0.1% 1.4% 9.0%
Ave $ received per student $11,760 $4,994 $4,686
Total Financial Aid
$ Awarded $8,252,524 $8,878,403 $8,275,673 $9,560,368
# of students* 582 612 574 574
% of students** 64.0% 68.3% 66.4% 67.1%
Ave $ received per student $14,180 $14,507 $14,418 $16,656
* Unduplicated # of students
**Based on annual unduplicated headcount
Annual Unduplicated Headcount 909 896 865 856
(per above)
FINANCIAL AID DEFINITIONS
l..w Total Students: The annual unduplicated headcount for the campus
$ Awarded: The sum of dollars awarded to students for each academic period of the yer per Report EXPL
# of Students: The sum of total students (unduplicated) receiving awards per Report EXPL
% of Students: The # of students receiving awards divided by the Total Students (unduplicated)
Average $ received per Student: The $ Awarded divided by the # of Students
3rd Party: Scholarships or payments received from employers and other outside non-Federal, non-State
entities. Third Party payments are included in "Other Financial Aid."
~
i.-
{
i.-
i.-
.,. APPENDIX 3.5
"-" Campus Name: McGregor
'dill
Employment Metrics
Y1!iiI FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07
"- ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL
'- FACULTY FTE
~ Core Faculty FTE 21.1 25.0 27.0 23.0
I Associate Faculty FTE 1.8 1.8 0.7 0.45
'-' Adjunct Faculty FTE 18.2 19.5 20.2 19.9
~ TOTAL FACULTY FTE 41.1 46.2 47.9 43.4
-. ADMINISTRATOR/STAFF FTE
i..- Administrator FTE 14.5 17.0 18.0 15.2
(.., Administrative Associate FTE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Unionized Staff FTE 14.0 14.5 13.5 15.5
.., Non-Union Staff FTE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
i TOTAL ADMIN. & STAFF FTE 28.5 31.5 31.5 30.7
-'-' TOTAL CAMPUS FTE 69.6 77.7 79.4 74.1
'-'
(.., RATIOS:
Unduplicated Student Headcount 909 896 865 856
'-' Student/Core Faculty Ratio 43.1 35.8 32.0 37.2
'-' StudentITotal Faculty Ratio 22.1 19.4 18.1 19.7
Student/Admin & Staff Ratio 31.9 28.4 27.5 27.9
I.-
"'- Adjunct - Associate/Core Faculty 0.95 0.85 0.77 0.88
.- Average Core Faculty Salary $53,620 $54,722 $54,457 $58,982
I.- Average Administrator Salary $44,651 $46,780 $44,860 $54,502
Average Admin. Associate Salary $0 $0 $0 $0
"- Average Union Annual Wages $28,985 $30,386 $32,557 $34,300
i..- Average Non Union Staff Salary $0 $0 $0 $0
'-' Total Campus Salaries $3,194,054 $3,569,531 $3,720,658 $3,883,165
'- Total Campus Benefits $1,042,692 $1,159,414 $1,353,995 $1,481,174
~ Ratio of Benefits to Salaries 0.33 0.32 0.36 0.38
I
Total Expenditures (Fund 1 Only) $6,243,650 $6,987,780 $7,173,827 $8,046,426~
"-
Ratio of Salaries & Benefits to
Expenditures 0.68 0.68 0.71 0.67
-
"- Gender Information
Core Faculty
~ Female (%) 54.5% 60.0% 48.1% 52.2%
i.- Male (%) 45.5% 40.0% 51.9% 47.8%
-t
Non-Faculty Staff
Female (%) 86.7% 80.6% 83.3% 75.0%
"- Male (%) 13.3% 19.4% 16.7% 25.0%
'6l!iIiI
I.-
'-
I..w
I
'-'
Ethnicity Information
Core Faculty
% African American 13.7% 12.0% 14.8% 4.3%
% Asian/Pacific Islander 4.5% 4.0% 3.7% 4.3%
% Indian/Alaska Native 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% Hispanic 4.5% 0.0% 3.7% 4.3%
% Caucasian 77.3% 84.0% 77.8% 87.1%
% Non-resident alien 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% Other/Unknown 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% Prefer Not to Report 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Staff
% African American 16.7% 12.9% 13.3% 18.8%
% Asian/Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% Indian/Alaska Native 3.3% 3.2% 3.3% 3.1%
% Hispanic 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% Caucasian 80.0% 83.9% 83.3% 78.1%
% Non-resident alien 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% Other/Unknown 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
% Prefer Not to Report 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
DEFINITIONS
Employee numbers are for hired employees only (those for whom we collect payroll taxes); they do not
include work-study students, part-time temporaries, employees from temporary agencies, or those
on personal service contracts (a.k.a. "independent contractors"). All reporting and measurements are to be for
Fund 1 employees only.
Core Faculty: Benefited faculty positions (as budgeted in Datatel Accounting Line 5100)
Administrator: Deans, directors, & senior level admin/technical (budgeted in Datatel Accounting Line 5130)
Admin Associates: Salaried mid-level staff positions (budgeted in Datatel Accounting Line 5140)
Union Staff: Represented wage employees (budgeted in Datatel Accounting Line 5160)
Non-Union Staff: Hourly compensated (budgeted in Datatel Accounting Line 5170)
Note: All personnel FTE will be calculated according to the categories in which they are budgeted.
If a person is split between two categories, then that person's FTE will be calculated consistently (e.g., 0.8 FTE
core faculty, 0.2 administrator).
All employment measures are to be made at the commencement of the Fall Term and will be
consistent with the data collected for the November IPEDS census report
Total Salaries and Benefits may be taken from the Datatel FSRP reports.
APPENDIX 4.1
Campus Name: Antioch New England
ENROLLMENT METRICS
FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07 FY 2007/08
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
STUDENT DATA (estimate)
Headcount- Undup All Students (Year) 1141 1133 1104 1060
MASTERS PROGRAMS
Headcount-Unduplicated for the year 790 772 765 760
Headcount-New Students (year) 317 318 329 339
Full-Time Students (Fall Term) 503 460 470 440
Part-Time Students (Fall Term) 131 162 183 188
FTE-Total Students over year (see definition belm 682 632 652 646
Credits-Total Students (Year) 14614 13546 13975 13860
Ave. credit load per student per yr 18.5 17.5 18.3 18.2
Credits-Total Students Fall Term 6101.0 5784.0 6028.0 5676
FTE-Total Students Fall Term in semester hours 762.6 723.0 753.5 709.5
Graduation Rates (program lengths vary - avg 2 years)
(% Graduated, Still Enrolled & Attrit to Date updated)
02-03 Entry 03-04 Entry 04-05 Entry
Applied Psychology Department Graduated 67.0% 76.00% 68.2%
Still Enrolled 0.0% 1.00% 12.5%
Attrition to Date WD or Disenrolled 33.0% 24.00% 17.3%
Education Department Graduated 92.0% 84.5% 84.2%
Still Enrolled 1.1% 1.2% 6.3%
Attrition to Date WD or Disenrolled 6.9% 14.3% 9.5%
Environ Studies Department Graduated 82.1% 73.9% 62.5%
Still Enrolled 11.5% 14.8% 27.3%
Attrition to Date - WD or Disenrolled 6.4% 11.4% 10.2%
Organization & Mgmt Department 89.1% 87.0% 90.3%
Still Enrolled 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Attrition to Date - WD or Disenrolled 10.9% 13.0% 9.7%
Retention
Applied Psychology Department 04-05 Entry 05-06 Entry 06-07 Entry
After 1 Year 87.5% 82.5% 91.4%
After 2 Years 81.7% 80.0% 2 yrs not up
Education Department
After 1 Year 96.8% 92.2% 96.2%
After 2 Years 94.7% 92.2% 2 yrs not up
Environmental Studies Department
After 1 Year 96.6% 93.3% 95.2%
After 2 Years 92.0% 93.3% 2 yrs not up
Organization & Management x
"-
After 1 Year 93.3% 97.0% 92.0%
After 2 Years 93.3% 97.0% 2 yrs not up
~
FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07 FY 2007/08
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
DOCTORAL PROGRAMS
'- Headcount-Total Students Undup Year 249 253 251 260
Headcount-New Students 45 41 40 47
"- Full Time Students (Fall Term) 210 207 198 205
t- Part-Time Students (Fall Term) 21 20 22 20
'-'
FTE-Total Students (year) 187 183 178 199
Credits-Total Students (Year) 4013.0 3931.0 3827.0 4264.0
'-' Ave. credit load per student per year 16.1 15.5 15.2 16.4
'-'
Credits - Total Students Fall Term 1726.0 1713.0 1612.0 1950.0
FTE-Total Students Fall Term (semester hours) 215.8 214.1 201.5 243.8
~ (converted to quarter credits) 322.0 319.6 300.7 363.8
'- Graduation Rates (Programs min 5 years) 99-00 Entry 00-01 Entry 01-02 Entry
'-'
~ Clinical Psychology Graduated (All years updated) 60.7% 62.1% 47.1%
Still Enrolled 21.4% 13.8% 29.4%
'-' Attrition to Date 17.9% 24.1% 23.5%
i.-
Environmental Studies Phd Graduated (all yrs update 50.0% 16.7% 11.1%
t- Still Enrolled 10.0% 33.3% 66.7%
i- Attrition to Date 40.0% 50.0% 22.2%
'- Retention Rates 04-05 Entry 05-06 Entry 06-07 Entry
'- Psy.D
'-
After 1 Year 93.3% 100.0% 92.3%
After 2 Years 86.7% 93.3% 2 yrs not up
'-
(..y ES-Phd
After 1 Year 100.0% 72.7% 100.0%
'- After 2 Years 85.7% 72.7% 2 yrs not up
"- OTHER STUDENTS (Special, Visiting, etc.)
'- Headcount-Total Undup Students (Year) 103 108 89 40
'-
FTE - Fall 05 Special Students (Converted to Qtr) 21 20 40 8
C-
Credits-Total Special Students·Fall 113 105 214 45
e- TOTAL UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT (Annual) 1141 1133 1104 1060
c- Ethnicity
'- % African American (02) 1.30% 0.97% 1.00%
'-
% Asian/Pacific Islander (03) 0.50% 0.44% 0.63%
% Indian/Alaska Native (04) 0.08% 0.18% 0.18%
.- % Hispanic (05) 1.70% 1.50% 1.63%
'-
% Caucasian (01) 88.10% 87.47% 86.23%
% Non-resident alien (07) 1.70% 1.50% 2.36%
~
'-
'-.....,
'vMv
(.,
% Other/Unknown (06) 6.60% 7.94% 7.97%
% Prefer Not to Report 0.00% (%) (%)
Total 99.98% 100.00% 100.00%
Average Age
Graduate 36.2 36.1 36.4
GENDER(%)
Graduate
Female 76.16% 76.61% 76.36%
Male 23.84% 23.39% 23.64%
FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL
ADMISSIONS METRICS (Annual) Updated
# of inquiries 3138 3896 3561
# of applications (to date from that year's Inquil 535 557 334
# of accepted students (to date from Inq pool) 329 349 225
# of new matriculants (to date from Inquiry poo 323 330 204
Conversion Rate 17.0% 14.3% 9.4%
Acceptance Rate 61.5% 62.7% 67.4%
Yield Rate 98.2% 94.6% 90.7%
% new matric to applications 60.4% 59.2% 61.1%
DEFINITIONS:
HEADCOUNT: This is the unduplicated headcount for the entire academic year, Le., counting each individual
student one time during the year. Headcount does not include Leave of Absence (LOA), but it does include
Enrollment Maintenance Fee (EMF) status. Headcount does not include Continuing Education.
NOTE: The total annual unduplicated headcount may not equate to the sum of the headcounts in
individual programs because of double counting of students who move from one program to another
during the same academic year.
FTE: Full Time Equivalent - Total credits divided by the minimum number of credits/full time load.
For programs on the quarter system, this is 8 credits for graduate programs and 12 credits for undergraduate
programs. Programs on the semester system are to convert semester credits to quarter credits, multiplying by
3/2, and then use the 8 or 12 divisors. The Fall Term's FTE will be reported as representative of the entire
academic year.
Graduation Rate: This is a program-by-program metric. It is the number of students graduating within an
individual program's graduation period divided by the total number of students who had entered the program
at the start of that period.
Retention Rate: The number of students remaining in a program after 1 year and 2 years divided by the total
number of students who had entered the program at the start of those periods.
Conversion Rate: The number of applicants divided by the number of inquiries
Acceptance Rate: The number of acceptances divided by the number of applicants
Yield Rate: The number of those enrolled (matriculated) divided by the number of acceptances
APPENDIX 4.2
Campus Name: Antioch New England
REVENUE AND EXPENSE METRICS
FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07 FY 2007/08
ACTUAL ACTUAL PRELIM. BUDGET
Tuition and Fees(net of discounts) $11,216,417 $11,125,925 $11,787,034 $12,902,827
Total Unrestricted Revenue (Fund 1) $11,414,645 $11,307,065 $11,933,918 $13,076,327
Total Unrestricted Expense (Fund 1) $11,285,149 $11,318,047 $11,545,816 $13,076,327
Net Fund 1 Revenue (Deficit) $129,496 ($10,982) $388,102 $0
Total Restricted Revenue (Fund 2)* $2,408,121 $2,617,732 $2,595,872 $1,514,978
Total Restricted Expense (Fund 2) $2,473,056 $2,573,953 $2,560,826 $1,514,978
Net Fund 2 Revenue (Deficit) ($64,935) $43,779 $35,046 $0
Total Fund 1 & 2 Net Revenue $64,561 $32,797 $423,148 $0
Other cash expenditures ($44,864) ($29,020) ($78,294) $5,000
Net Cash excess (shortfall) $109,425 $61,817 $501,442 ($5,000)
Unduplicated Student Headcount 1141 1,133 1,104 1,060
Ratios and Metrics (based on Fund 1 only)
Tuition & Fees as a % of Total Rev 81.1% 79.9% 81.1% 88.4%
Average Tuition Paid per Student $9,830 $9,820 $10,677 $12,172
Average Revenue per Student $10,004 $9,980 $10,810 $12,336
Average Expenses per Student $9,891 $9,989 $10,458 $12,336
*Does not include unexpended restricted revenue. Restricted revenue is only included once it has been
expended and released from restriction. It then becomes part of the unrestricted operating funds of the
University.
APPENDIX 4.3
Campus Name: Antioch New England
DEVELOPMENT METRICS
FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL
Gift Revenue Dollars
Endowment $20,000 $50,000 $0 $120,094
Scholarship $61,330 $81,618 $63,820 $89,064
Other restricted $235,728 $85,093 $231,220 $88,359
Unrestricted $58,924 $70,248 $64,266 $54,826
Total $375,982 $286,959 $359,306 $352,344
Gifts-in-Kind $0 $0 $0
Total Gift Revenue $375,982 $286,959 $359,306 $352,344
Grants and Contracts $2,218,646 $1,756,376 $1,952,919 $2,025,517
Endowment Fund
Total gift $ received $20,000 $50,000 $0 $120,094
Fund Balance $188,960 $238,960 $238,960 $359,054
Total Restricted Funds $297,058 $166,711 $295,040 $177,424
(other than endowment)
(,.,
'
C-t
(.,."
G
t:-
'
'
'
'
'-
- IDevelopment metrics include both restricted and unrestricted revenue.
~
DEFINITIONS
Gift Revenue:
Endowment-Gifts designated by the donor for the individual campus endowment fund.
Endowment gifts are recorded centrally in Datatel in Fund #4, campus 80.
Scholarship-Gifts designated by the donor for scholarships for students of the campus.
Scholarship gifts are recorded in cost centers 81000-81999, 83000-83999 and 84000-84999 in the
individual campuses.
Other Restricted-Gifts with use restricted by the donor to specific purposes other than endowment or scholarshi~
Other Unrestricted-Gifts not restricted by the donor to a specific fund or purpose.
Gifts-in-kind:
Gifts received other than in cash, such as goods or services.
Endowment Funds:
Endowment funds managed centrally in Fund #4, but maintained for use by individual campuses.
Gifts to the endowment funds are recorded in Datatel under line item #4100-4120 in the cost
center used for that particular fund in Campus 80.
Scholarship and other restricted funds:
Funds outstanding which have not been released for use as of the reporting date, designated
by donors for specific purposes such as scholarships or for purposes other than endowment.
APPENDIX 4.4
Campus Name: Antioch New England
FY 2006/07
FINANCIAL AID METRICS
FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
$4,561,123 $4,740,311 $4,507,062
583 606 582
51.1% 53.0% 51.4%
$7,824 $7,822 $7,744
$5,199,082 $5,621,609 $5,624,444
535 546 534
46.9% 47.8% 47.1%
$9,718 $10,296 $10,533
$349,709 $281,621 $281,634
116 92 98
10.2% 8.0% 8.6%
$3,015 $3,061 $2,874
$253,189 $503,791 $481,691
35 61 52
3.1% 5.3% 4.6%
$7,234 $8,259 $9,263
N/A N/A N/A
0.0%
$663,091
157
14.2%
$4,224
0.0%
$167,317
21
1.9%
$7,967
0.0%
$197,252
22
2.0%
$8,966
$268,364
72
6.5%
$3,727
$5,165,373
604
54.7%
$8,552
$6,179,855
547
49.5%
$11,298
$453,623
138
12.2%
$3,287
N/A
0.0% 0.0%
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0%
$446,964
122
10.7%
$3,664
N/A
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
$524,375
148
13.0%
$3,543
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/ASEOG
$ Awarded
# of students
% of students
Ave $ received per student
Pell Grants
$ Awarded
# of students
% of students
Ave $ received per student
Stafford Loans-Subsidized
$ Awarded
# of students
% of students
Ave $ received per student
Stafford Loans-Unsubsidized
$ Awarded
# of students
% of students
Ave $ received per student
Perkins Loans
$ Awarded
# of students
% of students
Ave $ received per student
Alternative Loans
$ Awarded
# of students
% of students
Ave $ received per student
Plus Loans
$ Awarded
# of students
% of students
Ave $ received per student
Work Study-Federal
$ Awarded
# of students
% of students
Ave $ received per student
Work Study-State
$ Awarded
# of students
% of students
Ave $ received per student
Other Federal Aid
$ Awarded $91,396 $109,021 $134,138 $60,184
# of students 21 26 32 20
% of students 1.8% 2.3% 2.8% 1.8%
Ave $ received per student $4,352 $4,193 $4,192 $3,009
Other State Aid N/A N/A N/A N/A
$ Awarded
# of students
% of students 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Ave $ received per student
Institutional Scholarship
$ Awarded $257,746 $424,638 $416,077 $411,208
# of students 95 126 151 163
% of students 8.3% 11.0% 13.3% 14.8%
Ave $ received per student $2,713 $3,370 $2,755 $2,523
Other Financial Aid
$ Awarded $334,319 $437,997 $415,246 $493,324
# of students 110 115 110 132
% of students 9.6% 10.1% 9.7% 12.0%
Ave $ received per student $3,039 $3,809 $3,775 $3,737
Total Financial Aid
$ Awarded $11,570,939 $12,565,951 $12,313,915 $13,605,967
# of students· 680 714 733 742
% of students·· 59.6% 62.5% 64.7% 67.2%
Ave $ received per student $17,016 $17,599 $16,799 $18,337
I
IdIiIi/
*Unduplicated # of students
**Based on annual unduplicated headcount
Annual Unduplicated Headcount 1141
(per above)
FINANCIAL AID DEFINITIONS
1143 1133 1104
Total Students: The annual unduplicated headcount for the campus
$ Awarded: The sum of dollars awarded to students for each academic period of the yer per Report EXPL
# of Students: The sum of total students (unduplicated) receiving awards per Report EXPL
% of Students: The # of students receiving awards divided by the Total Students (unduplicated)
Average $ received per Student: The $ Awarded divided by the # of Students
3rd Party: Scholarships or payments received from employers and other outside non-Federal, non-State
entities. Third Party payments are included in "Other Financial Aid."
"'-'
(,.
t.-
'-
.., APPENDIX 4.5
...., Campus Name: Antioch New England
* Employment Metrics
~ FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07 FY 2007/08
~ ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
~ FACULTY FTE
r- Core Faculty FTE 51.0 52.0 51.0 54.0
t- Associate Faculty FTE 3.6 1.6 2.0 2.4
Adjunct Faculty FTE 14.2 15.4 14.8 14.6
'- TOTAL FACULTY FTI 68.8 69.0 67.8 71.0
-
ADMINISTRATOR/STAFF FTE
"- Administrator FTE 12.0 12.0 11.0 15.0
'- Administrative Associc: 16.0 20.0 22.0 16.0
'-
Unionized Staff FTE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Non-Union Staff FTE 26.0 24.0 23.0 22.0
~ TOTAL ADMIN. & STA 54.0 56.0 56.0 53.0
~
~
TOTAL CAMPUS FTE 122.8 125.0 123.8 124.0
~ RATIOS:
i.-
Unduplicated Student 1,141 1,133 1,104 1,060
Student/Core Faculty 22.4 21.8 21.6 19.6
'-' StudentITotal Faculll 16.6 16.4 16.3 14.9
"-
Student/Admin & Sta 21.1 20.2 19.7 20.0
'- Adjunct - Associate/( 0.35 0.33 0.33 0.31
~ Average Core FacultJ $49,230 $49,726 $54,638 $55,523
~ Average Administratt $49,327 $53,261 $60,439 $56,310
~ Average Admin. Assl $34,460 $34,248 $33,723 $42,640
Average Union Annu $0 $0 $0 $0
I.- Average Non Union ~ $22,983 $25,052 $27,019 $27,597
~
'-
Total Campus Salarie~ $5,291,436 $5,535,317 $5,673,381 $6,006,472
Total Campus Benefit~ $1,741,751 $1,982,018 $2,049,608 $2,350,691
'- Ratio of Benefits to S 0.33 0.36 0.36 0.39
"- Total Expenditures(Fl $11,285,149 $11,318,047 $11,591,630 $13,076,325
~ Ratio of Salaries & 0.62 0.66 0.67 0.64
t.- Gender Information
"- Core Faculty
'-
Female (%) 51.0% 51.9% 47.1% 50.0%
Male (%) 49.0% 48.1% 52.9% 50.0%
~ Non-Faculty Admin & Staff
~ Female (%) 79.6% 78.6% 75.0% 83.0%
Male (%) 20.4% 21.4% 25.0% 17.0%
..v
~
YlIIi1
"-
'-
Ethnicity Information
Core Faculty
% African Americar 2.0% 1.9% 2.0% 3.7%
% Asian/Pacific Isle 2.0% 1.9% 2.0% 1.9%
% Indian/Alaska Native
% Hispanic
% Caucasian 96.1% 96.2% 96.1% 94.4%
% Non-resident alien
% Other/Unknown
% Prefer Not to Report
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Admin & Staff
% African American
% Asian/Pacific Islander
% Indian/Alaska Nc 5.6% 1.8% 3.6% 3.8%
% Hispanic
% Caucasian 94.4% 98.2% 96.4% 96.2%
% Non-resident alien
% Other/Unknown
% Prefer Not to Report
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
DEFINITIONS
Employee numbers are for hired employees only (those for whom we collect payroll taxes); they do not
include work-study students, part-time temporaries, employees from temporary agencies, or those
on personal service contracts (a.k.a. "independent contractors"). All reporting and measurements are to be for
Fund 1 employees only.
Core Faculty: Benefited faculty positions (as budgeted in Datatel Accounting Line 5100)
Administrator: Deans, directors, & senior level admin/technical (budgeted in Datatel Accounting Line 5130)
Admin Associates: Salaried mid-level staff positions (budgeted in Datatel Accounting Line 5140)
Union Staff: Represented wage employees (budgeted in Datatel Accounting Line 5160)
Non-Union Staff: Hourly compensated (budgeted in Datatel Accounting Line 5170)
Note: All personnel FTE will be calculated according to the categories in which they are budgeted.
If a person is split between two categories, then that person's FTE will be calculated consistently (e.g., 0.8 FTE
core faculty, 0.2 administrator).
All employment measures are to be made at the commencement of the Fall Term and will be
consistent with the data collected for the November IPEDS census report
Total Salaries and Benefits may be taken from the Datatel FSRP reports.
~
'-'
t..-
"- APPENDIX 5.1
:Ai' Campus Name: Seattle
~
ENROLLMENT METRICS
FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07 FY 2007/08
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
C- STUDENT DATA
~ UNDERGRADUATEPROGRAMS
- Headcount-Total Students 352 329 250 237
Headcount-New Students 123 99 82 94
'- Total Credits (Annual) 8003 7028 6439 6412
i Ave. credit load per student 22.7 21.4 25.8 27.1
'-'
t.-
FTE-Total Students (Fall Term) 180.6 158.6 160.9 152.3
Full-Time Students (Fall Term) 99.0 80.0 89.0
t- Part-Time Students (Fall Term) 151.0 136.0 115.0
-.
Graduation Rates
SA Completion 34.8% 31.3% 43.7%
<- SA wI Teachers Certif. 71.1% 72.2% 81.8%
~
Retention Rates
SA Completion
(.- After 1 Year 77.3% 72.7% 73.8%
; After 2 Years 68.2% 67.7% 63.2%
--
SA wI Teachers Certif.
'-' After 1 Year 100.0% 97.0% 83.3%
i After 2 Years 84.4% 86.1% 84.8%
(.., MASTERS PROGRAMS
'-
Headcount- Total Students 943 880 788 648
Headcount-New Students 324 251 238 256
i
---
Total Credits (Annual) 21299 18328 14775 13994
"- Ave. credit load per student 22.6 20.8 18.8 21.6
l....
FTE-Total Students (Fall Term) 664.3 598.1 489.7 525.9
Full-Time Students (Fall Term) 369.0 312.0 242.0
'- Part-Time Students (Fall Term) 270.0 278.0 283.0
<-
Graduation Rates
MAEd 40.0% 58.8% 63.2%
l.- MAEd (Site) 86.5% 84.3% 94.4%
e- MAEd (wlTeachers Cert) 77.7% 81.7% 86.7%
Psychology 18.7% 15.8% 9.8%
t- Creative Change 44.6% 58.0% 66.1%
e- Retention Rates
MAEd
~ After 1 Year 66.7% 85.0% 100.0%
"- After 2 Years 80.0% 75.0% 89.5%
t-
MAEd (Site)
After 1 Year 88.6% 90.6% 66.7%
~ After 2 Years 92.3% 85.7% 94.4%
MA (Teachers Cert)
"- After 1 Year 91.7% 81.5% 81.5%
~
"-'
~
.w
i.,
~
~
After 2 Years 83.0% 83.3% 88.8%
Psychology
dIiv After 1 Year 91.3% 86.7% 82.8%
After 2 Years 84.0% 90.4% 81.7%V!JtdI Creative Change
Vail After 1 Year 89.2% 93.0% 75.4%
"- After 2 Years 60.0% 82.0% 77.4%
.- DOCTORAL PROGRAMS
i.- Headcount-Total Students 20 41 75 114
Headcount-New Students 20 24 44 45i,..., Total Credits (Annual) 474 996 1986 3432.0
~ Ave. credit load per student 23.7 24.3 26.5 30.1
i.., FTE-Total Students (Fall Term) 24.4 39.3 75.8 118.7
Total Credits (Annual) 112
'- Ave. credit load per student 18.7 #DIV/O! 0.0 #DIV/O!
FTE-Total Students (Fall Term) 4.9
'..-
~ TOTAL UNDUPLICATED
'-
HEADCOUNT (Annual) 1,317 1,244 1,207 1,154
'-' Ethnicity
~ % African American 6.5% 3.9% 3.6%
% Asian/Pacific Islander 3.3% 2.7% 2.7%
(.., % Indian/Alaska Native 3.2% 3.0% 2.9%
t.- % Hispanic 2.5% 70.7% 67.3%
z.-
% Caucasian 70.3% 1.4% 0.4%
% Non-resident alien 0.8% 10.6% 15.2%
~ % Other/Unknown 12.7% 1.6% 1.8%
% Prefer Not to Report 0.6% 100.0% 100.0%
'
